M14型(M14)——歐美十佳突擊步槍

M14型(M14)——歐美十佳突擊步槍在《歐美十佳突擊步槍》中排名第13名。我們精選了部分網友觀點： ...

型歐美十佳突擊步槍在歐美十佳突擊步槍中排名第13名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

M14是一個相當沉重的步槍但不是相當強勁的男性.我把一個在67 \ / 68年在越南和感激我發布最好的半自動步槍.它非常準確和在伊拉克被用作狙擊步槍.它至少是一樣耐用其他突擊步槍和7.62圓是一個遠程殺手.沒有\ u2018fragile \ u2018 M14部分.這是提高\ u2018son \ u2018 M1,喬治·巴頓的步槍叫\ u2018the最好戰斗實現設計.\ u2018 FN歧視與香港產品G36也非常好,但是如果一個人需要一個步槍能夠執行在所有天氣和地形,叢林或開放田地和山,我仍然會選擇M14 !民用版標準作為M14 M1A本質上是相同的除了它只能半自動開火,但斯普林菲爾德也使得一個國家匹配和超級匹配M1A.我擁有M1A超級比賽,我永遠不會放棄這個步槍!

The M14 is a fairly heavy rifle but not for any reasonably strong male. I carried one in '67/'68 in Vietnam and am thankful I was issued the best semi auto rifle available. It is extremely accurate and was used as a sniper rifle in Iraq. It is at least as durable as any other assault rifle and the 7.62 round is a long range killer round. There are no "fragile" parts on the M14. It is the IMPROVED "son" of the M1, the rifle that George Patton called "the finest battle implement ever devised." The FN FAL is also very good as is the HK G36, but if one needs a rifle able to perform well in all weather and terrain, jungle or open fields and mountains, I would still choose the M14! The civilian version (the standard M1A) is essentially the same as an M14 except it can only fire on semi-auto but Springfield also makes a national match and super match M1A. I own a M1A super match and I would never part with this rifle! I carried an M14 many, many years ago, but I also now own at present an AR-15, AR-10, FN-FAL, AK-47, SIG 556, FN-SCAR, M1A, HK-91, M1 Carbine, and an M1 Garand. When I was young, the M14 was no problem. At the present time it is way too heavy, but it is still a wonderful rifle that never fails you and is extremely accurate.If I had to buck one around now, I would choose the SCAR in 5.56. First weapon I trained with in USMC trained on 500 meter course. in Vietnam only rifle I would carry could hit consistently out ot 800 meters with open sights, gotta agree the punch and range were worth the weight. cxivilian model lacks the properly headspaced bolt (matched to the specific rifle ) ( sereial # on bolt same as sereial # on rifle without this it wasent as accurate also civilian version doesn't normally come with milspec barrel, maby 10 % of manufactured barrels were good enough for USMC M-14 civbilian version any barrel would do, or not do if you get my meaning. Mill spec parts make a huge diference my opinion. An excellent, reliable battle rifle. Proven in combat. Never should have been replaced by the m16.It certainly qualifies, by any objective standard, as among the top 5 or 6 "best battle rifles" on earth.

···································································

我進行一個M14很多年前,但現在我也自己目前ar - 15, AR-10, FN-FAL, ak - 47,團體556年FN-SCAR, M1A, hk - 91, M1卡賓槍,M1加侖。當我年輕的時候,M14是沒問題。目前它太重了,但它仍然是一個美妙的步槍,總是你和非常準確。如果我現在巴克一約,我會選擇5.56的疤痕。

···································································

我第一武器訓練與裝備的訓練在500米租賃越南只步槍我將可能達到一致與開放的景點,ot 800米得同意打孔和范圍是值得的。cxivilian模型缺乏適當的頂部空間螺栓匹配特定的步槍sereial

···································································

一個優秀的、可靠的戰斗步槍。在戰斗中證明。不應該被取代m16。當然合格,任何客觀標準,躋身前5或6 \ u2018best戰斗步槍\ u2018在地球上。

···································································

耐用,高度精確的武器,與新股票可以適合所有的附件請您加上觸發7.62北約,最好的突擊步槍子彈

···································································

非常準確和可靠+最好是強大的步槍的AJ很重但不壞基本上取代,因為它太好一般問題

···································································

基于m - 1加侖,這是現代步槍的鼻祖。M-39今天使用,這不僅步槍包一拳,但非常準確。

···································································

小斗牛式導彈短版的M14。但是所有的武器好雙方從原始。加上許多附件rails和高流動性由于小斗牛式導彈的設計。