·······································································
···································································
這是如何在廣島和長崎呢?當然,死亡人數要高得多,有無辜的人,但日本的目的是使美國無用,不能保護自己。美國想結束戰爭。日本廣島和長崎技術負責無論如何;如果他們沒有轟炸珍珠港,美國不會采取報復。珍珠港襲擊本身不僅僅是悲劇,但也導致其他攻擊。
How is this below Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Granted, the death toll was higher, there were innocent people, but Japan's intention was to make America useless so that it couldn't defend itself. America wanted to end the war. Japan is technically responsible for Hiroshima and Nagasaki anyways; if they hadn't bombed Pearl Harbor, America wouldn't have taken revenge. The Pearl Harbor attack isn't just tragic in itself, but also that it caused other attacks.
···································································
這是幾乎沒有攻擊,這是一個政治運動,這是日本沉沒試圖保護自己的美國艦隊駐扎在珍珠港。2500名士兵男人愿意給他們的生活因戰爭死亡,后來在二戰40000美國士兵死于美國襲擊日本小島。10倍以上的人死于攻擊但仍一些小東西,比如珍珠港被認為是比這更悲慘?
This was barely an attack, it was a political move, it was the Japanese trying to protect themselves by sinking the American fleet (stationed at pearl harbour). 2500 soldiers (men willing to give their lives for war) died, later on in WWII 40,000 American soldiers died in an American assault on a small Japanese island. More than 10 times the amount of people died on that assault but still something as small as pearl harbour is considered more tragic than that?
···································································
傾聽自己。- SilverstreamSucks
Listen to yourself. - SilverstreamSucks
···································································
這發生了第一次原子彈在廣島和NagasakiSo日本之前,老實說,你應得的。你們開始第一。日本邪惡地襲擊了non-soldiers剛擁有和平的祈禱時間,他們感到驕傲,他們成功。他們抱怨原子彈后,怎么?你真丟臉。
This happened first before Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and NagasakiSo Japanese, honestly, you deserved that. You guys started this first. Japanese evilly attacked non-soldiers who were just having peaceful praying time, and they were so proud that they succeed. How come they complained about Atomic bombs after that? Shame on you guys.
···································································
另一個歷史事件現在經歷+ u2018revision + u2018使它與當前lib-think。可惜不再剩下許多幸存者告訴修正一個飛躍。
Another historic event now going through "revision" to align it with current lib-think. A shame not many of the survivors are left any more to tell the revisionists to take a flying leap.
···································································
這是一件可怕的事。我們在這一點上甚至不參與二戰和日本決定攻擊我們樂趣。他們絕對殘酷的我們在戰爭中以及在亞洲和中國南部部落。至于廣島和長崎,盡管這是一個悲傷的事件,他們來了。
This was a horrible thing. The US at that point wasn't even involved in WW2 and Japan just decided to attack us. fun. They were absolutely brutal to us in war as well as tribes in southern asia and China. As for hiroshima and nagasaki, though it was a sad event, they had it coming for them.
···································································
我現在是tragity但美國人應該檢查導致即使你工作在一個空軍基地附近你仍應檢查有做什么即使你認為他們曾經有做什么
I now that it was a tragity but Americans should have checked cause even when you work near an air base you should still check what there doing even if you think their what ever there doing
···································································
這樣對我對我是歷史上最悲慘的時刻。它只是讓我幾乎我的膝蓋聽到這個悲慘的故事和故事的一天!
This to me is the saddest moment in history for me. It just brings me almost to my knees to hear the stories and back story's in this tragic day!
···································································
這遠比桑迪應該10或高于桑迪ho你忘了加2016好攻擊的別斯蘭學校人質追都比桑迪我的意見
This is far by worse than sandy hook should be 10 or higher than sandy hook ho you forgot to add 2016 nice attacks and the beslan school hostage seige which are both worse than sandy hook my opinion
···································································
我喜歡當人們批評杜魯門廣島,但他們似乎忘記了日本開始戰爭我們bombimg usTruman不是總統此時但沒關系。- Therandom
I love when people criticize Truman for Hiroshima, but they seem to forget Japan started the war with us by bombimg us(Truman wasn't president at this point but it doesn't matter). - Therandom
0 篇文章
如果覺得我的文章對您有用,請隨意打賞。你的支持將鼓勵我繼續創作!