情報(Intelligence)——歐美人生最重要的十件事

情報(Intelligence)——歐美人生最重要的十件事在《歐美人生最重要的十件事》中排名第32名。 LemonComputer,只是因為身體和軀體上我們進化的方式像動物一樣并不意味著我們等于動物。在心理和社會進化的方式,和動物只是因為適應不斷變化的環境。我不相信一個活著的理論,但我也不相信進化論只是因為這兩個理論不能被證明是...

情報歐美人生最重要的十件事在歐美人生最重要的十件事中排名第32名。

LemonComputer,只是因為身體和軀體上我們進化的方式像動物一樣并不意味著我們等于動物。在心理和社會進化的方式,和動物只是因為適應不斷變化的環境。我不相信一個活著的理論,但我也不相信進化論只是因為這兩個理論不能被證明是準確的驗證,因此不確定性。我沒有答案來解釋生活真的開始沒有人。所有的理論都是投機的但我相信動物和人類完全是兩個物種,因為在soma ++心理的差異。所以,我認為你是對的的演變只是物理的部分。 LemonComputer;我談論一些主觀和經驗,分享信息和談論它。動物不能分享他們的主觀經驗和肯定不會談論它。動物本能的行動,我沒有說100?20來顯示他們的主觀情緒或沖動行為。這是一個客觀事實,第二;你說我們不會稱自己為動物只是因為我們的自我?這就像說,狗不是動物,僅僅因為我們稱之為狗?在動物這個詞有很明顯的類別不同的物種,所以我不理解你的邏輯評論。我們也可以對人類做出類別種族、顏色等。但它仍然是一個類別的人類和類別的動物分離。和evollving喜歡我們進化的像雞嗎?或許多其他動物嗎?驗證中。這是一個事實,人類與所有子類別和動物. .有更多動物和人類有很大的區別只是說的事實,我們有能力或者認為我們動物或不是已經改變。如果沒有區別我們為什么要使用+ u2018人類+ u2018這個詞而不是動物。一些科學家說,我們是理性的動物但是其他科學家不喜歡使用這句話。這一事實我們可以討論這個話題的證明是一個分離的物種。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

LemonComputer, just because we evolved on a physical and somatic way like animals doesn't mean that we're equal to animals. We evolved on a psychologic and social manner as well, and animals just adapted themselves because of changing circumstances. I don't believe in a god-created theory but I don't believe in the evolution theory either just because those two theories can't be proven with exact verifications and therefor with no certitude. I don't have the answers to explain how life really began ( nobody does. All theories are speculative in that matter ) but I believe that animals and humans are two completely species because of the difference in the soma / psych. So, I think you're right about the evolvement but only for the physical part.

···································································

LemonComputer;我談論一些主觀和經驗,分享信息和談論它。動物不能分享他們的主觀經驗和肯定不會談論它。動物本能的行動,我沒有說100?20來顯示他們的主觀情緒或沖動行為。這是一個客觀事實,第二;你說我們不會稱自己為動物只是因為我們的自我?這就像說,狗不是動物,僅僅因為我們稱之為狗?在動物這個詞有很明顯的類別不同的物種,所以我不理解你的邏輯評論。我們也可以對人類做出類別種族、顏色等。但它仍然是一個類別的人類和類別的動物分離。和evollving喜歡我們進化的像雞嗎?或許多其他動物嗎?驗證中。這是一個事實,人類與所有子類別和動物. .有更多

LemonComputer ; I'm talking about experience something subjective and share that information and talk about it. Animals can't share their subjective experience and certainly not talk about it. Animals act by instinct ( and I didn't say 100%! ) OR by impulsive acts to show their subjective emotions. And that's an objective fact. Second ; you're saying that we will not call ourselves animals just because of our egos? That it is like saying that dogs aren't animals just because we call them dogs? In the word animals there are obviousely categories of different species, so I don't understand your logic about that comment. We can also make categories about humans ( race, color etc... ) but it's still a separation of categories of humans and categories of animals. And about the evollving like them ( are we evolving like chickens? Or many other animal species for that matter? ). It's a fact in verifications that humans ( with all there sub-categories ) and animals ( with all there ... more

···································································

動物和人類有很大的區別只是說的事實,我們有能力或者認為我們動物或不是已經改變。如果沒有區別我們為什么要使用+ u2018人類+ u2018這個詞而不是動物。一些科學家說,我們是理性的動物但是其他科學家不喜歡使用這句話。這一事實我們可以討論這個話題的證明是一個分離的物種。

There's a huge difference between animals and humans ( just the fact that we are capable of saying or thinking that we're animals or not makes already a difference.). If there was no difference why should we use the word " human " instead animal. Some scientists says that we're rational animals but other scientists don't like to use that statement. Just the fact that we can discuss this topic is proof of a separation of the species.

···································································

這就像是說狗不是動物因為我們稱之為狗。當然我們不會稱自己為一個動物,我們與巨大的自我。——LemonComputer生物

That's like saying that dogs aren't animals because we call them dogs. Of course we're not going to call ourselves an animal, we're creatures with huge egos. - LemonComputer

···································································

你猜錯了!我是個無神論者,但我相信在科學精確的科學,準確的說,人類不同于動物的DNA的DNA。所以,當改變發生在一個類別的偽造至少有兩個不同的category-facts。人類不能被動物當a + B驗證不同。響應的評論IronSabbathPriest誰猜我宗教!。

You guessed wrong! I'm an atheist. But I believe in exact science. And exact science says that DNA of humans are different than the DNA of animals. So, when a difference occurs in a category of falsification there's at least two different category-facts. Humans can't be animals when A plus B are different verifications. ( Response against the comment of IronSabbathPriest who guesses I'm religious! ).

···································································

我們不是動物。因為一些科學家這樣說并不意味著這是一個事實。人類可以體驗和分享他們的主觀經驗與其他人類。動物沒有權力來表達自己的主觀經驗。動物本能或沖動行為。這就是人類從動物分離。

We are not animals. Because some scientists says so doesn't mean that this is a fact. Humans can experience and share their subjective experiences with other humans. Animals don't have the power to express their subjective experiences. Animals just act by instinct or by impulse. That's what separates the humans from the animals.

···································································

我們動物因為我們進化就像他們銆?同時,代理100?本能只適用于簡單的生物體,這主要是bug銆?- LemonComputer

We're animals because we evolved just like them. Also, acting 100% on instinct only goes for simple minded organisms, which are mainly bugs. - LemonComputer

···································································

智慧是人類應該have.But一些有更多和less.If你有更多的,你會有更多advantage.But我們不能選擇我們有多少智慧,所以不要強迫自己。

Intelligence is something humans should have.But some has more and some has less.If you have more,you will have more advantage.But we cannot choose how much intelligence we have,so don't force yourself.

···································································

不是情報分享知識的能力?我投票。- LemonComputer知識

Isn't intelligence the ability to share knowledge? I voted knowledge instead. - LemonComputer

···································································

智能是智能u areKnowledge是多少你知道和體會——JohnPierre88

Intellegence is how smart u areKnowledge is how much u know and have exprience - JohnPierre88