威靈頓公爵(The Duke of Wellington)——歐美歷屆十大軍事將領

威靈頓公爵(The Duke of Wellington)——歐美歷屆十大軍事將領在《歐美歷屆十大軍事將領》中排名第33名。我們精選了部分網友觀點： Wellington defeated Napoleon! He...

威靈頓公爵歐美歷屆十大軍事將領在歐美歷屆十大軍事將領中排名第33名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

Wellington defeated Napoleon! He rarely fought if he was going to lose and when he won he won big, when he suffered a defeat it he made sure it was small (that he was undefeated is not true). He possessed self awareness not common in great Generals and absolute clear dispassionate judgement. He managed up to his sceptical parliament and made the best of the meagre resources allowed by them. He may lack the flair of some of the others in this list but his attention to detail, logistical mind and level headedness made sure he was fully successful in his campaigns and that still has its impact on Europe today.

···································································

他的戰術思想更廣泛的思考不僅僅是戰斗。托雷斯的Vedras例如,他知道他不可能擊敗法國軍隊在正面戰場半島,所以在國家保密3防御強化行構建保護里斯本和焦土政策后,法國被迫全面撤退與他們通過饑餓和疾病的痛苦無數傷亡。盡管他在葡萄牙和西班牙打了很多勝仗,惠靈頓表示,他最大的勝利是在Assaye在印度,1803年,他約000名男性和17個大炮對50歲的000名男性和100名炮。努力戰斗的勝利從一個英國最偉大的將軍。

He had a tactical mind that was wider thinking than just the battle at hand. The Lines of Torres Vedras for example, he knew that he could not defeat the French Peninsular army in open battle, so under state secrecy had 3 defensive fortification lines constructed to protect Lisbon and following a scorched earth policy, forced the French into full retreat with them suffering numerous casualties through starvation and disease. Despite his many victories in Portugal and Spain, Wellington stated that his greatest victory was that at Assaye in India, 1803, where he had roughly 10, 000 men and 17 cannon against 50, 000 men with 100 cannon. A hard fought victory from one of Britain's greatest generals.

···································································

據我所知,惠靈頓是唯一一般在這個名單上擊敗了其他版本,但他比被他征服的對手再。60戰不敗的十五年,是他無可救藥地數量,無疑是一個令人印象深刻的記錄。這第四富有的愛爾蘭土地所有者的兒子參軍,因為它被認為他永遠不會達到任何東西,但他是唯一一個韋爾斯利家族的任何水平的名聲。簡單的將軍和絕對應該在前十。

As far as I can tell, Wellington is the only General on this list to have defeated any of the others, and yet he is further down the list than his vanquished opponent. 60 battles undefeated over a period of fifteen years, where mostly he was hopelessly outnumbered, is an undeniably impressive record. This fourth son of a wealthy Irish land owner joined the military as it was believed he would never amount to anything - and yet he is the only one of the Wellesley family who has any level of fame. Simply phenomenal general and should definitely be in the top ten.

···································································

我喜歡他比拿破侖。確定拿破侖軍事可能更有經驗,最好的策略,但我更喜歡惠靈頓的方面。他很聰明,學習他的對手好,更好的戰略家和卑微的拿破侖將軍導致他在法國許多勝利。拿破侖相比他從未犯過嚴重錯誤或可怕的錯誤。他仔細事實上學會了從錯誤中學習和思想更好的從他的損失。

I prefer him better than Napoleon. Sure Napoleon may be more militarily experienced and had better tactics but I like Wellington's aspects better. He was smarter, studies his opponents well, better strategist and out-thought most of Napoleon's generals which lead him to many victories over the French. Compared to Napoleon he never made any serious blunders or terrible mistakes. He infact learns from his mistakes carefully and thought better from his losses.

···································································

韋爾斯利的戰斗記錄是模范;他參與一些60戰斗的過程中他的軍事生涯,包括,但不限于,Seringapatam和Assaye在印度,維多利亞在西班牙,,嗯…是的,滑鐵盧!韋爾斯利自適應風格著稱的戰爭,導致幾對數值比軍隊的勝利,而減少自己的損失。他是,毫無疑問,最偉大的指揮官之一,和他的許多戰術和作戰計劃仍在世界各地的軍事院校學習。

Wellesley's battle record is exemplary; He participated in some 60 battles during the course of his military career, including, but not limited to, Seringapatam and Assaye in India, Vitoria in Spain, and, umm... Oh yeah, Waterloo! Wellesley is famous for his adaptive style of warfare, which resulted in several victories against numerically superior forces, while minimizing his own losses. He is, without doubt, one of the greatest commanders of all time, and many of his tactics and battle plans are still studied in military academies around the world.

···································································

擊敗拿破侖和他的同事,繼承英國軍隊結構、紀律、物流、經常數量,不可靠的盟友,欣賞他的軍隊,盡管聲譽不同他的戰術視情況而定,只有亞歷山大顯然更好,同行包括拿破侖,馬爾伯勒,尤金和尤利烏斯?凱撒。幾乎沒有其他常見的候選人有這樣有才華的對手和政治和組織問題。

Beat Napoleon and the rest of his Marshals, re-invented the British Army structure, discipline, logistics, frequently outnumbered, unreliable Allies, admired by his troops, despite reputation varied his tactics depending upon the situation. Only Alexander clearly better, peers include Napoleon, Marlborough, Eugene and Julius Caesar. Almost none of the other common candidates had such talented opponents and had the political and organisational issues.

···································································

雖然拿破侖征服歐洲大部分地區,惠靈頓拿破侖征服了所有的將軍們!他應該有點高。

While Napoleon conquered most of Europe, Wellington conquered all of Napoleon's generals!He should have been a bit higher.

···································································

優秀的戰術家專家使用土地的堿液。也許是歷史上最偉大的防守一般eji大多與數量的軍隊,還經常不同國籍的塑造成一個強大的力量。真正的他在滑鐵盧布呂歇爾的幫助下,但他仍持有法國主要攻擊首次被迫撤退的。

Excellent tactician an expert at using the lye of the land. Perhaps the greatest defensive general in history eji mostly fought with outnumbered armies, often of different nationalities yet moulded them into a formidable force. True he was helped by Blucher at Waterloo, but he still held off the main French attack forced the first ever retreat of the Imperial guard.

···································································

真正的一個偉大的將軍,他擊敗了,通過引入游擊戰,法蘭西帝國由拿破侖在拿破侖戰爭的半島之戰,導致西班牙和葡萄牙的解放。他還最后的打擊拿破侖在滑鐵盧戰役。

Truly one of the greatest generals of all times, he defeated, through introducing guerilla warfare, the French Empire (led by Napoleon) during the Peninsular Campaign of the Napoleonic wars, which led to the liberation of Spain and Portugal. He also dealt the final blow to Napoleon at the battle of Waterloo.

···································································

這難道不是更高嗎?可笑的。特別是有非常有限的證據對大衛王實際上存在。負責半島戰爭的勝利和在滑鐵盧。你想要更多的什么?

How is this not higher? Ludicrous. Especially given there is exceptionally limited evidence for King David having actually existed. Responsible for the victories in the Peninsular War and at Waterloo. What more do you want?