羅杰斯先生的鄰居(Mister Rogers‘ Neighborhood)——歐美有史以來最差的兒童節目

羅杰斯先生的鄰居(Mister Rogers' Neighborhood)——歐美有史以來最差的兒童節目在《歐美有史以來最差的兒童節目》中排名第33名。我們精選了部分網友觀點： ...

·······································································

···································································

這個節目是一個經典。羅杰斯先生教孩子如何控制自己的情緒,以及工廠是如何工作的。——thomwim

This show was a classic. Mister Rogers taught children how to control their feelings, as well as how factories work. - thomwim

···································································

對不起為投票,但誰把這個名單上似乎準備毀了童年

Sorry for voting, but whoever put this on the list seems ready to ruin childhoods

···································································

誰把這個節目必須有一個討厭的童年。

Whoever placed this show on this must of had a horrid childhood.

···································································

這個節目其實是很好的,但對大一點的孩子有點糟透了。

This show was actually really good, but kinda sucks for older kids.

···································································

好的羅杰斯先生獨自一人并不壞,剝離羅杰斯先生系列。- Connor360給毀了

Ok Mister Rogers alone wasn't bad, the spinoff just ruined the Mister Rogers franchise. - Connor360

···································································

沒有這一個是好的,然而,丹尼爾老虎不是。——bobthehallwayman

No this one is actually good, Daniel Tiger however, is not. - bobthehallwayman

···································································

誰把這個名單上完全沒有生活!

Whoever put this on the list has absolutely no life!

···································································

什么?這個節目太棒了!

What? This show is great!

···································································

他們把這個節目因為我們耗盡

They put this show here because we're running out

···································································

在童年時如果你投票支持這個!

Right in the childhood if you voted for this!

0 條評論