·······································································
···································································
Bomberman根據刑法有待研究的在我看來。
Bomberman was criminally under-researched in my opinion.
···································································
不是一個Bomberman歌迷,但fhi是不準確的。真的不準確。
Not a Bomberman fanboy, but fhis one was inaccurate. REALLY inaccurate.
···································································
伙計們,我們有一個問題。沒有人,我重復,沒有人投票支持這個巨大的不良在第一季,但我看到一個投票給一個不存在的海綿寶寶vs皮卡丘。為什么這是一個問題嗎?因為這場斗爭是一團糟的研究。首先,僅僅因為在地上挖挖有更好的流動性并不意味著任何事情。特別是當Bomberman比軒轅十四,他打破了泛光燈立方體地摧毀了星系。力量不是萬能的,當然,但這并不意味著Bomberman并不破壞在其他類別too.Bomberman挖挖了一顆爆炸的Bomberman英雄,也沒有這不是微妙的不同于其他的耐久性,它就在你的面前。更不用說,他不是和石頭一樣愚蠢的描繪的戰斗中,他的其他,更有經驗的bombermen,尤其是黑色轟炸機。他們認為他愚蠢的唯一原因是因為他可以用自己的炸彈被困,這是球員的錯誤。…更多——nerffan8000
Guys, we have a problem. No one, and I repeat, NO ONE has voted for this massive dud in Season 1, yet I see a vote for a nonexistent "SpongeBob vs Pikachu" on here. Why is this a problem? Because the research for this fight was a complete mess. First of all, just because Dig Dug has better mobility in the ground doesn't mean anything. Especially when Bomberman is stronger than Regulus, who smashed the Omni Cube so hard it destroyed galaxies. Strength isn't everything, sure, but that doesn't mean Bomberman doesn't destroy Dig Dug in other categories too.Bomberman's taken a planet-sized explosion at the end of Bomberman Hero, and no it's not subtle unlike other feats of durability, it's right in front of your face. Not to mention, he's not as dumb as rocks as portrayed in the fight. He's taken out other, more experienced bombermen, especially Black Bomber. The only reason they considered him stupid is because he can get trapped with his own bomb, which is player error. ... more - nerffan8000
0 篇文章
如果覺得我的文章對您有用,請隨意打賞。你的支持將鼓勵我繼續創作!