• <noscript id="ecgc0"><kbd id="ecgc0"></kbd></noscript>
    <menu id="ecgc0"></menu>
  • <tt id="ecgc0"></tt>

    禁止任何形式的暴力,判處了死刑(Ban Violence in Any Form, Punishable by Death)——歐美如果你統治世界,你將制定的十大法律

    禁止任何形式的暴力,判處了死刑(Ban Violence in Any Form, Punishable by Death)——歐美如果你統治世界,你將制定的十大法律 在 《歐美如果你統治世界,你將制定的十大法律》 中排名第2名。 ...

    禁止任何形式的暴力判處了死刑歐美如果你統治世界你將制定的十大法律在歐美如果你統治世界你將制定的十大法律中排名第2名。



    ·······································································

    我們精選了部分網友觀點:

    ···································································


    禁止暴力,如果有人傷害別人判他們死刑,因為這無辜的人不應該傷害他們如此傷害這個人傷害家人所以我們應該傷害他們。


    Banning violence and if someone hurts someone else sentence them to death because this innocent person shouldnt have hurt them so hurting this person hurts there family so we should hurt them back.

    ···································································


    我討厭暴力,你不應該這樣做,這個世界上沒有一個地方,死罪嗎?也許這有點. . - FremantleDockers太遠


    I hate violence, you just shouldnt do it and it has no place in this world. Punishable by death? Maybe thats a little bit too far... - FremantleDockers

    ···································································


    不,從來沒有。暴力回應暴力和人民應該被保鏢或者抽10,50,100或1000倍,但死亡嗎?所殺人犯應該執行在特殊情況下,應該沒有。——yatharthb休息


    No, Never. Violence should be responded by violence and the people should be beaten up by bouncers or be lashed on the back 10,50, 100 or a 1000 times but death? No.Only Murderers should be executed and in special cases, rest should be spared. - yatharthb

    ···································································


    任何致命的謀殺,除非自衛,犯人死亡。這是唯一的方式激發恐懼和犯罪結束。我的一個我的統治者臀部。——Therandom的主要規則


    Any lethal murder, unless it's self defense, the convict dies. It's the only way to inspire fear and end crime. One of my major rules for my rulers hip. - Therandom

    ···································································


    這不是太殘酷的懲罰這種犯罪?人們可以很容易地濫用法律錯誤的指控。


    Isn't this too cruel a punishment for such a crime? And people can easily misuse that law (like false accusations).

    ···································································


    我們不應該打架但對于禁止任何形式的暴力,我們應該只殺了他們,如果他們謀殺


    We should not fight but for Banning violence in any form we should only kill them if they murder

    ···································································


    嚴重嗎?甚至我認為這是愚蠢的,如果你打我,我可以合法地把你殺了嗎?——Cazaam


    Seriously? Even I think that is stupid. If you punch me, I can legally get you killed? - Cazaam

    ···································································


    因為很多目的人被殺當他們想過他們的生活


    Because a lot of intent people being killed when they are suppose to live their life

    ···································································


    這是自相矛盾的。怎么可能被禁止暴力如果死亡更暴力的懲罰嗎?這可能是一個死氣沉沉的茅,但請記住,你不能以火攻火。


    This is very self-contradictory. How could violence be banned if the punishment for it is death (more violence)? This may be a clich茅, but remember, you can't fight fire with fire.

    ···································································


    死亡不是第一個進攻將是一個很好的聲音跳動。


    Not death for the first offense which would be a good sound beating.

    • 發表于 2020-12-06 06:41
    • 閱讀 ( 489 )
    • 分類:世界

    你可能感興趣的文章

    相關問題

    0 條評論

    請先 登錄 后評論
    admin
    admin

    0 篇文章

    作家榜 ?

    1. xiaonan123 189 文章
    2. 湯依妹兒 97 文章
    3. luogf229 46 文章
    4. jy02406749 45 文章
    5. 小凡 34 文章
    6. Daisy萌 32 文章
    7. 我的QQ3117863681 24 文章
    8. 華志健 23 文章

    推薦文章

    聯系我們:uytrv@hotmail.com 問答工具
  • <noscript id="ecgc0"><kbd id="ecgc0"></kbd></noscript>
    <menu id="ecgc0"></menu>
  • <tt id="ecgc0"></tt>
    久久久久精品国产麻豆