唐納德布萊德曼爵士歐美史上十大擊球手板球在歐美史上十大擊球手板球中排名第2名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

如果你正在談論的歷史最好的擊球手并布萊德曼爵士。當然,他在美國近東難民援助組織更少的團隊比今天. .但布萊德曼在一個時代,他們在這里玩上發現了球。我們不要忘記事實,像布萊德曼這樣的球員職業生涯第二次世界大戰打斷了。一段時間后,他們的職業生涯resumed.Bradman致力于完善他的技能著稱,這樣的著名的高爾夫球擊球碰壁樹墩上磨他的手眼coordination.Bradman舉行很多擊球記錄,如大多數雙世紀和測試中得分最高的板球多年前這些紀錄最終被打破。然而,他仍保持著最高的平均測試板的記錄歷史。歷史,許多專家認為永遠不會broken.When布萊德曼退出板球比賽在1948年,他得了6996分52測試29世紀…更多

If you are talking about the best batsman of all-time that is Sir Don Bradman. Granted, he played in anEra where there were fewer team than there is today... But Bradman played in an era where they played on uncovered pitches. Let's not forget the fact that players like Bradman had there careers interrupted by the Second World War. It was some time before their careers resumed.Bradman was known for his dedication to perfecting his skills, such the famous batting the golf ball up against the wall with a stump to sharpen his hand-eye coordination.Bradman held a lot of batting records, such as the most double centuries and the highest score in test cricket for many years before some of these records were eventually broken. However, he still holds the record for the highest average in test cricket history. A record that many experts believe will never be broken.When Bradman retired from test cricket in 1948 he had scored 6,996 runs in 52 tests with 29 centuries ... more

···································································

布萊德曼無疑是最好的。在大約20年期間平均為99.94 !沒有人接近。如果有人出現在40年,幾乎4倍測試板球比Tendulkar和比他更多的運行,因為他打了那么多,但平均只有一半多一點Tendulkar平均說30,我們會說他是比Tendulkar嗎?我建議+ u2018hell沒有+ u2018.It一樣的布萊德曼v Tendulkar.Averages故事的全部。布萊德曼平均,可能至少下一個世界上最好的兩倍時間平均。Tendulkar甚至沒有擊球率高達杰奎斯Kallis,還采取了271測試wicket,盡管薩欽在擊球的道路子大陸所有time.Tendulkar也取得了8世紀測試包括至少兩個200 +不出局對孟加拉國和津巴布韋和布萊德曼從來沒有這樣的劣質反對。布萊德曼的63 80測試局…更多

Bradman is easily the best. Averaged 99.94 over about a 20 year period! No one else comes close. If someone came along in 40 years and played almost 4 times more test cricket than Tendulkar has and made a lot more runs than him, because he played so much more, but averaged only a little over half what Tendulkar has averaged (say 30), would we say he was better than Tendulkar? I'd suggest "hell no".It's the same as for Bradman v Tendulkar.Averages tell the full story. Bradman averaged what, probably at least double what the next best in the world of his time averaged. Tendulkar doesn't even have a batting average as high as Jaques Kallis, who has also taken 271 test wickets, despite Sachin playing on batting roads in the sub continent all the time.Tendulkar has also made 8 test centuries (including at least two 200+ not outs) against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe and Bradman never got to play against such inferior opposition. (63 of Bradman's 80 test innings were ... more

···································································

我不知道為什么人們投票給Tendulkar。爵士并統計,他的技巧,和他對比賽的影響是驚人的。和那些說他只有52踢了幾場比賽平均近100和Tendulkar扮演了超過180平均56看布萊德曼的一流的記錄28067運行在234場比賽平均95.14 117世紀,37雙世紀,6三元組和一個四452。而Tendulkar取得22 k近300場比賽我認為少于80世紀。擊球在舊的時代更加困難,發現球,沒有先進的蝙蝠,更大的理由,沒有技術。我的意思是來吧,先生都是最大的。薩欽不是甚至比韋夫理查茲或者杰克霍布斯。

I don't know why people vote for Tendulkar. Sir Don stats, his skill, and his influence on the game are phenomenal. And those who say that he only played few matches (52 averaging almost 100) and Tendulkar has played over 180(average 56)have to look at Bradman's first-class record which is 28,067 runs in 234 matches at an average of 95.14 with 117 centuries, 37 double centuries, 6 triples and one quadruple (452*). While Tendulkar has scored just 22k (I think) in almost 300 matches with less than 80 centuries. Batting was much more difficult in the old era, uncovered pitches, no advanced bats, larger grounds, no technology. I mean come on, Sir Don is the greatest. Sachin is not even better than Viv Richards or Jack Hobbs.

···································································

哇有一些蠢貨發布在這個網站上,布萊德曼不是1號如何?我猜這是事實的反映有超過十億的印度人能夠投票支持Tendulkar和布萊德曼只有2000萬澳大利亞人投票,所以這些數字真正不利并投票。但這并不重要,因為所有人都能看到的有記錄,標明薩欽一半不一樣好,沒有羞恥。

Gee there are some imbeciles posting on this website. How can Bradman not be number 1? I guess this is a reflection of the fact there are well over a billion Indians able to vote for Tendulkar and only 20 million Australians to vote for Bradman, so the numbers are well and truly stacked against The Don in a poll like this one. But it doesn't matter because the records are there for all to see and they clearly indicate Sachin is about as half as good as the Don, and there's no shame in that.

···································································

布萊德曼爵士是1號到目前為止!由于這是一個人氣競賽,你不能擊敗的票數從印度球迷,他們有10億人口畢竟,所以你會看到薩欽,Sehwag, Dravid . .等。高。因此這個列表意味著很少!他們都是優秀的擊球手毫無疑問,但他們不是布萊德曼。我很驚訝Gavaskar并不高,他是杰出的。勞拉是Tendulkar,勞拉是一個在壓力下比賽的贏家。

Sir Bradman is No. 1 by far! Since this is a popularity contest, you can't beat the number of votes from Indian fans, they have a population of 1 billion afterall, so you are going to see Sachin, Sehwag, Dravid... Etc. High on the list. Therefore this list means very little! They were all excellent batsman no doubt, but they were not Bradman. I'm surprised Gavaskar wasn't higher, he was brilliant. Lara is up there with Tendulkar, Lara was a match winner under pressure.

What can you say he had a average of 99.94. At least 30 runs ahead of the second best Pollock at 60. He was the greatest batter of all time by miles. He batted 3 and coud handle the bowling with content. One guy was on 90 when he got out he got his century first. No one could come close to him. He barely got out. His average would be over 100 if the war didn't come. When the wicket keeper was injured he keeped. He was a very smart cricketer. Greatest sportsman of all time.

He the best full stop. 99.94 average at any time is still good. No come close.

···································································

哇難以置信的天才,是最偉大的運動員讓孤獨最大的擊球手,沒有人接近他的記錄,那些低于他之所以常常被稱為“傳奇”,…這使也,圣人,我不確定。玩疾病和失蹤的長時間戰爭期間,攜帶的期望。我很自豪地成為一個澳大利亞人,澳大利亞是最偉大的!

Wow unbelievable this genius, is the greatest sportsman of all time let a lone the greatest batsman of all time, nobody has come close to his record, those below him are refered to as legends...what does that make the Don, a saint, I am not sure. Playing with illness and missing long durations during the war, carrying the expectation of the nation. I am proud to be an Aussie and to have an Australian to be the greatest of all time!

···································································

如何。是最偉大的板球運動員Sachin Tendulkar。別誤會我,他可能值得第二,但板球的唐?布拉德曼有一個狀態,只有與其他運動的喜歡邁克爾·喬丹。99.94的平均水平。這家伙是一個頭和腳首先別人。你可以有各種各樣的記錄和你,但到目前為止平均高于其余的來自un-comparable 20年的職業生涯。

How. HOW is Sachin Tendulkar the greatest Cricket player of all time. Don't get me wrong, he probably deserves second, but Don Bradman has a status in cricket that is only rivaled in other sports by the likes of Michael Jordan. 99.94 average. The guy is a head and foot above all others. You can have all sorts of records and what have you, but an average so far above the rest from a 20 year career is un-comparable.

···································································

這是真正令人驚訝的印第安人如何認為,卡比布萊德曼。Tendulkar測試平均?53.86。布萊德曼測試平均?只是一個卑微的99.94。布萊德曼不得不處理擊球手的規則并不青睞。其中最promiment的身體行series.I可以明白印度人將有偏見的板球運動員,但他們蒙蔽,布萊德曼無疑是最好的擊球手。

It is truly astonishing how Indians can think that that Tendulkar is better than Bradman. Tendulkar test average? 53.86. Bradman test Average? Just a lowly 99.94. Bradman had to deal with the rules where the Batsman was not favoured. The most promiment of these being the Body line series.I can understand that Indians will be biased to there fellow cricketers, but they are blinded to see that Bradman is undoubtably the best batsman ever lived.