
·······································································
···································································
1970年,瑪格麗特法院成為第一個女人在開放的時代,第二個女人在歷史上贏得所有四大滿貫賽事單打冠軍在同一個日歷年。法院贏得了記錄24的冠軍在她的職業生涯,她也贏得了19個女子雙打和混合雙打冠軍,19日給她創紀錄的62個主要標題。她的所有表面的職業比賽勝率91.74 1177 ++ 106創歷史紀錄。國際網球名人堂,+ u2018For純粹的強度性能和成就沒有一個網球運動員比賽+ u2018。她顯然是最偉大的女性的網球選手,為什么她不1號嗎?
In 1970, Margaret Court became the first woman during the open era and the second woman in history to win all four Grand Slam tournament singles titles in the same calendar year. Court won a record 24 of those titles during her career. She also won 19 women's doubles and 19 mixed doubles titles, giving her a record 62 Major titles overall. Her all surfaces career match winning percentage of 91.74 (1177/106) is an all-time record. The International Tennis Hall of Fame states, "For sheer strength of performance and accomplishment there has never been a tennis player to match her". She is clearly the greatest female tennis player of all time, so why is she not number 1 on this list?
···································································
法院·塞萊斯背后有不到一半的猛烈抨擊她,從不贏得溫布爾登,甚至差點贏得它,即使在她'前刺。是的。法院恨變得可笑。所以她是一個同性戀恐懼癥,不是婦女解放論者,突然意味著你可以無視她的成就好像不存在。
Court behind Seles who has less than half the slams she has and never won Wimbledon or even came close to winning it, even in her prime before the stabbing. Yeah ok. The Court hate has gotten ridiculous over the years. So she is a homophobe and not a womens libber, that suddenly means you can just ignore her achievements like they don't exist.
···································································
法院也不是國王的朋友,納芙拉蒂諾娃,施賴弗和他們的集團基本上控制一切來自北美和英國媒體,所以自動貶值。·塞萊斯是親密的朋友納芙拉蒂諾娃和施賴弗所以自動撞在公眾視線的偏見的角度來看這個小團體的女性。清洗和重復。- feisty37
Court is also not friends with King, Navratilova, Shriver, and their clique who basically control everything that comes out the North American and British media, so is automatically devalued. Seles is close friends with Navratilova and Shriver so is automatically bumped up in the public eye through the bias perspective given by this clique of women. Rinse and repeat. - feisty37
···································································
大多數單一大slams.Most單打腺大滿貫titlesMost單打titlesMost雙打大滿貫titles.Most雙打titles.Most混合雙打大滿貫titles.Equal childrenNo懷疑后最大滿貫冠軍最好的時間
Most single grand slams.Most singles gland slam titlesMost singles titlesMost doubles grand slam titles.Most doubles titles.Most mixed doubles grand slam titles.Equal most grand slam titles after childrenNo doubt best of all time
···································································
記錄在單打和雙打冠軍說炒作,把一個時代高于另一個就是——+ u2018hype + u2018。他們的競爭中一個運動員不應該淪為anuls neo-era修正主義的be-littles在發揮他們的優勢僅僅缺乏競爭。
The record across singles and doubles titles says it all - hype that puts one era above another is just that - "hype". An athlete that dominates their competition shouldn't be relegated to anuls of neo-era revisionism which be-littles their dominance in play to a mere lack of competition.
···································································
比任何人更主要標題,時間旅行到重大事件,她扮演了很多雙打和混合雙打,她有健身和毅力和耐力,將她置于包。考慮把你的排名是有偏見的
More major titles than anyone, longer road trips to get to major events, she played so many doubles and mixed doubles, she had the fitness and stamina and endurance that puts her way ahead of the pack. Ever put that into consideration your rankings are biased
···································································
Serena在結合法院無關,因為她沒有一件事,一個好的體育精神。應該我也提到,瑪格麗特勝率最高和最標題和大滿貫。一些美國人投票瑟瑞娜需要三思。
Serena has nothing on Margeret Court because of one thing she doesn't have, a good sportsmanship. Should I also mention, Margaret has the highest winning percentage and the most titles and a grand slam. Some of the Americans who voted Serena need to think again.
···································································
瑪格麗特法院共有64 GS 24單打冠軍頭銜。比任何其他女性19雙打和21混合雙打,總共64人。她GS標題超過任何其他的女人,所以她應該考慮
Margaret Court has a total of 64 GS titles. 24 singles titles (more than any other woman ever) 19 doubles and 21 mixed doubles, for a total of 64. She has more GS titles than any other woman, so she should be considered #1 of all time, purely by her numbers.
···································································
大滿貫單打和混合比別人更多的大滿貫單打。更多grandslams單打,雙打和混合比任何人。她的記錄和主導地位不言而喻。
A grand slam in singles and mixed, more grand slam in singles than anyone else. More grandslams in singles, doubles and mixed than anyone. Her record and dominance speaks for itself.
···································································
偉大的球員毫無疑問。我看見她掙扎與一個年輕的克里斯翻轉70年代早期的盡管在排名總是讓我猶豫她很高。
Great player no doubt. I saw her struggling against a young Chris Evert in the early '70's though which always makes me hesitate in ranking her very high.
0 篇文章
如果覺得我的文章對您有用,請隨意打賞。你的支持將鼓勵我繼續創作!