教孩子們說,Dhushan(It teaches kids to argue.Dhushan)——歐美亞瑟被高估的十大原因

教孩子們說,Dhushan(It teaches kids to argue.Dhushan)——歐美亞瑟被高估的十大原因在《歐美亞瑟被高估的十大原因》中排名第15名。如果agruements最終成為他們不是朋友然后我能理解你的意思,但總是agruements完成的深層含義,有幾次,我以為只是保持你的觀點,這些人是錯誤的,然而最后一集我意識到雙方應該有equel指出ag...

教孩子們說,Dhushan(It teaches kids to argue. Dhushan)——歐美亞瑟被高估的十大原因在歐美亞瑟被高估的十大原因中排名第15名。

如果agruements最終成為他們不是朋友然后我能理解你的意思,但總是agruements完成的深層含義,有幾次,我以為只是保持你的觀點,這些人是錯誤的,然而最后一集我意識到雙方應該有equel指出agruement的機會,只要你有事實支持他們咳嗽,咳嗽,你們——Dhushan 你能證明嗎?

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

如果agruements最終成為他們不是朋友然后我能理解你的意思,但總是agruements完成的深層含義,有幾次,我以為只是保持你的觀點,這些人是錯誤的,然而最后一集我意識到雙方應該有equel指出agruement的機會,只要你有事實支持他們咳嗽,咳嗽,你們——Dhushan

If the agruements ended up as them not being freinds then I could understand you're point, but always the agruements finished of with a deeper meaning, there was several instances where I thought "just keep your point, those guys are wrong", however at the end of the episode I realized that both sides should have an equel chance to point out their agruement, as long as you have facts to support them *cough, cough, you guys* - Dhushan

···································································

你能證明嗎?

Can you prove that?