約翰克萊頓(John Clayton)——歐美最邪惡的迪斯尼惡棍

約翰克萊頓(John Clayton)——歐美最邪惡的迪斯尼惡棍在《歐美最邪惡的迪斯尼惡棍》中排名第27名。我們精選了部分網友觀點： ...

約翰克萊頓歐美最邪惡的迪斯尼惡棍在歐美最邪惡的迪斯尼惡棍中排名第27名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

我讀過許多十大迪斯尼反派角色列表,我很少見過克萊頓的特色,而不是取代等人拉特克利夫夫人屈里曼和州長,這兩個肯定是邪惡的,但我不同意他們更加邪惡,Clayton.My原因是,不僅是克萊頓惡性獵人配有一個癡迷于金錢和瀕危物種的完全漠視,但他也并不在乎法律他休息。他非常愿意查克簡和她的爸爸在船上的,并且也非常愿意不僅毆打泰山,但也殺他。只要他現金,他很高興。他還殺任何人,他打死Kerchak,接著把斯內普,并成為不錯的就在他死之前,一種策略,只有很少的原因除了給泰山一種滿足的感覺,讓我們比我們最初更沮喪。歡呼,…更多

I've read a number of Top Ten Disney Villain lists, and very rarely have I seen Clayton featured, instead replaced by people such as Lady Tremaine and Governor Ratcliffe, both of which are certainly villainous, but I disagree with either of them being more evil that Clayton.My reasons for which being that, not only is Clayton a vicious hunter complete with an obsession with money and a total disregard for endangered species, but he also doesn't really give a damn about which laws he breaks in the process. He was perfectly willing to chuck Jane and her daddy in the ship's hold, and was also perfectly willing to not only beat up Tarzan, but also kill him as well. As long as he got his cash, he was happy to kill anyone that got in his way. Also, he killed Kerchak, who then proceeded to pull a Snape, and become nice just before he died, a ploy that has very few reasons other than to give Tarzan a feeling of fulfillment and make us even more depressed than we originally were. Cheers, ... more

···································································

約翰克萊頓的原因是邪惡的,因為他開槍Kerchak,幾乎殺死了泰山。

The reason why John Clayton is evil because he shot Kerchak and almost killed Tarzan.