• <noscript id="ecgc0"><kbd id="ecgc0"></kbd></noscript>
    <menu id="ecgc0"></menu>
  • <tt id="ecgc0"></tt>

    史萊克第三(Shrek the Third)——歐美最差動畫夢工廠電影

    史萊克第三(Shrek the Third)——歐美最差動畫夢工廠電影 在 《歐美最差動畫夢工廠電影》 中排名第5名。 我必須看這個華盛頓乘公共汽車從我的實地考察,這很好。不確定第一個怪物史萊克有很多尷尬的笑話和情節漏洞但它仍然有足夠的優點使它好。這不過是純粹的垃圾。情節是不好的,舊的人物現在的,新的人物甚至跛足的人,貓可能...

    史萊克第三歐美最差動畫夢工廠電影在歐美最差動畫夢工廠電影中排名第5名。


    我必須看這個華盛頓乘公共汽車從我的實地考察,這很好。不確定第一個怪物史萊克有很多尷尬的笑話和情節漏洞但它仍然有足夠的優點使它好。這不過是純粹的垃圾。情節是不好的,舊的人物現在的,新的人物甚至跛足的人,貓可能是這部電影的唯一好處。哦,阿蒂是不均的角色。總的來說,我給這部電影一個C -年級。Anonymousxcxc 貓有自己的電影。這部電影是decent.This mattstat716垃圾。 這部電影不是很有趣,但它仍然可以被視為幽默。它毫無新意的新角色不是很有趣,。但是賈斯汀·汀布萊克亞瑟王的聲音會成為一個偉大的聲音從吃豆人的世界系列作品。

    ·······································································


    ·······································································

    我們精選了部分網友觀點:

    ···································································


    我必須看這個華盛頓乘公共汽車從我的實地考察,這很好。不確定第一個怪物史萊克有很多尷尬的笑話和情節漏洞但它仍然有足夠的優點使它好。這不過是純粹的垃圾。情節是不好的,舊的人物現在的,新的人物甚至跛足的人,貓可能是這部電影的唯一好處。哦,阿蒂是不均的角色。總的來說,我給這部電影一個C -年級。Anonymousxcxc


    I had to watch this on the bus ride back from my Washington D.C. field trip and well it wasn't good. Sure the first Shrek had a lot of awkward jokes and plot holes but it still had enough good qualities to make it okay. This however is just pure rubbish. The plot is bad, the old characters are now lame, the new characters are even lamer, and Puss is probably the only good thing about this movie. Oh and "Artie" is the whiniest character ever. Overall I give this movie a C- grade. - Anonymousxcxc

    ···································································


    貓有自己的電影。這部電影是decent.This mattstat716垃圾。


    Puss got his own movie. That movie was decent.This was trash. - mattstat716

    ···································································


    這部電影不是很有趣,但它仍然可以被視為幽默。它毫無新意的新角色不是很有趣,。但是賈斯汀·汀布萊克亞瑟王的聲音會成為一個偉大的聲音從吃豆人的世界系列作品。


    This film is just not that interesting, but it can still count as humorous. And it's corny The new characters are not very funny, though. But Justin Timberlake (the voice of King Arthur) would be a great voice for Blinky (from Pac-Man World series).

    ···································································


    我喜歡這部電影當我小的時候,我發現我所有的dvd和決定昨天看這個。我意識到這是不太好。很無聊和很容易在史萊克系列最弱。


    I used to love this movie when I was little. Then, I found all my DVDs and decided to watch this yesterday. I realized it's not so good. It is very boring and is easily the weakest in the Shrek franchise.

    ···································································


    Jacksfilms是正確的,Schaffrillas產品是正確的,這個續集很糟糕。它需要從史萊克佳能中刪除。


    Jacksfilms was right, Schaffrillas Productions was right, this sequel sucks. It needs to be removed from the Shrek canon.

    ···································································


    或者你可以刪除《怪物史萊克4》,讓它有意義的一個完整的三部曲——darthvadern


    Or you could just remove Shrek Forever After to make it a complete trilogy that makes sense - darthvadern

    ···································································


    Threequels棘手。但這并不給它一個借口很無聊,無趣,缺乏創意


    Threequels are tricky. But that does not give it an excuse for being boring, unfunny and short on ideas

    ···································································


    史萊克系列應該停在史萊克2。——街


    The Shrek series should've stopped at Shrek 2. - Rue

    ···································································


    無聊和很多壞動作。噢,是的,敵人是煩人的。


    Boring and a lot of bad moves. Oh yeah, the villian is annoying.

    ···································································


    為什么這是高于老板嬰兒嗎?——JustAnotherUser_


    Why is this higher than Boss Baby? - JustAnotherUser_

    • 發表于 2020-12-08 23:27
    • 閱讀 ( 705 )
    • 分類:影視

    你可能感興趣的文章

    相關問題

    0 條評論

    請先 登錄 后評論
    admin
    admin

    0 篇文章

    作家榜 ?

    1. xiaonan123 189 文章
    2. 湯依妹兒 97 文章
    3. luogf229 46 文章
    4. jy02406749 45 文章
    5. 小凡 34 文章
    6. Daisy萌 32 文章
    7. 我的QQ3117863681 24 文章
    8. 華志健 23 文章

    推薦文章

    聯系我們:uytrv@hotmail.com 問答工具
  • <noscript id="ecgc0"><kbd id="ecgc0"></kbd></noscript>
    <menu id="ecgc0"></menu>
  • <tt id="ecgc0"></tt>
    久久久久精品国产麻豆