• <noscript id="ecgc0"><kbd id="ecgc0"></kbd></noscript>
    <menu id="ecgc0"></menu>
  • <tt id="ecgc0"></tt>

    要是自然(Stokers Natural)——歐美十大無煙煙草品牌

    要是自然(Stokers Natural)——歐美十大無煙煙草品牌 在 《歐美十大無煙煙草品牌》 中排名第36名。 我們精選了部分網友觀點: ...

    要是自然歐美十大無煙煙草品牌在歐美十大無煙煙草品牌中排名第36名。



    ·······································································

    我們精選了部分網友觀點:

    ···································································


    我相信這是我被在一個自由的味道,被告知這哥本哈根。像所有其他的說法,這是一個謊言。要是人們不要浪費你的錢。這是一個可怕的產品,最終你只會浪費錢的兩倍開車回到了商店和得到一個可以真正的鼻煙。


    I believe this was the flavor I was given in a free can and was told "It compares to Copenhagen". Like all others that claim that, it's a lie. People don't waste your money on Stokers. It's a horrible product and you will only end up wasting twice the money to drive back to the store and get a can of real snuff.

    ···································································


    不介意其他評論,我要是從哥本哈根,因為味道更好,持續兩倍long.Stokers是一個高質量的下降,以較低的價格出售,因為它仍然是私人擁有和經營的方式


    Don't mind that other comment, I switched from Copenhagen to stokers because the flavor is way better and lasts twice as long.Stokers is a high quality dip that's sold at a low price because it is still privately owned and operated the way it should be

    ···································································


    偉大的而不是偉大的香水的味道但美味便宜99 c


    Great but not to great smells like perfume but great taste cheap 99c a can

    • 發表于 2020-12-10 06:19
    • 閱讀 ( 592 )
    • 分類:公司

    你可能感興趣的文章

    相關問題

    0 條評論

    請先 登錄 后評論
    admin
    admin

    0 篇文章

    作家榜 ?

    1. xiaonan123 189 文章
    2. 湯依妹兒 97 文章
    3. luogf229 46 文章
    4. jy02406749 45 文章
    5. 小凡 34 文章
    6. Daisy萌 32 文章
    7. 我的QQ3117863681 24 文章
    8. 華志健 23 文章

    推薦文章

    聯系我們:uytrv@hotmail.com 問答工具
  • <noscript id="ecgc0"><kbd id="ecgc0"></kbd></noscript>
    <menu id="ecgc0"></menu>
  • <tt id="ecgc0"></tt>
    久久久久精品国产麻豆