
·······································································
···································································
這部電影唯一的可取之處在于,一些配音表演是得體的,有一刻讓我咯咯地笑了起來。其他的一切都從糟糕到可怕。幽默包括可怕的雙關語、可悲的鬧劇嘗試和身體機能的隨機實例。所以,是的,幽默基本上是根本不存在。主角是非常不可能的。我知道關鍵是他應該得到教訓,但我們仍然需要能夠支持他!所有的設計看起來都是從某個地方剽竊來的。動畫本身在很大程度上是可以的,但有些情況下,這些動作對他們來說毫無意義。毫無幫助的是,這部電影看起來像是在64號準將(Commodore 64)上拍攝的。影片沒有意識到它想要代表什么樣的文化或時代。汽車和建筑看起來明顯是50年代,但壞蛋們說話都像30年代的人,更不用說配樂是現代流行音樂……更多
The only redeeming qualities of this movie are that some of the voice acting is decent, and there was like, one moment that made me chuckle. Everything else about it ranges from bad to horribly awful. The humor consists of terrible puns, pitiful attempts at slapstick, and random instances of bodily functions. So yeah, the humor is basically non-existent. The main character is extremely unlikable. I realize that the point is that he's supposed to earn his lesson, but we still need to be able to root for him! All of the designs look like they're ripped from somewhere. The animation itself is okay for he most part, but there are certain instances where the motions have no weight to them. Not helping is the fact that this film looks like it was rendered on a Commodore 64. The film has no sense of what culture or era it wants to represent. The cars and buildings look distinctly 50s, but the bad guys talk like they're from the 30s. Not to mention that the soundtrack consists of modern pop ... more
···································································
去年,如果我沒記錯的話,學校在八年級的時候去看電影,我相信這部電影,《冰凍》和《博物館之夜》都是我們的選擇。我孩子氣的時候,選擇這部電影是因為它的名字,而且由于還不成熟,它與堅果有關。我的觀點是,正如我在前面的評論中提到的,這也是其中之一我看過的最好的電影。我建議你看
Last year, if I remember correctly, the school took the eighth grade on a trip to the movies and I believe this, frozen, and the night at the museum were our options. Being childish, I chose this movie because of the name and, still being immature, it had to do with nuts. My point is, this is also, as I mentioned in a previous comment, one of the best movies I've seen. I recommend watching it.
···································································
夢工廠對《越過樹籬》的惡作劇。現在,我不確定是否有人會同意我的觀點,但這似乎也像是對夢工廠另一部電影《蜜蜂搬家》的剽竊。哦,還有另外一件事,他們在這部電影中使用了“恒河風格”,這是YouTube上有史以來收視率最差的歌曲之一
Some cheesy ripoff of Over the Hedge by Dreamworks. Now, I'm not sure anyone's gonna agree with me, but it also seems like a ripoff of the Bee Move, another Dreamworks film. Oh, and another thing; they used the song "Gangam Style" in this movie and it's one of the worst rated songs ever on YouTube.
···································································
這不是一部糟糕的電影,它讓人感到悲傷并傳達了一個好消息,動物們認為他死了,有些人發現他還活著,但他所做的并沒有得到認可。我想說的是,有時候你不會因為你所做的事而得到贊揚,但唯一重要的是,你知道你很偉大,已經成為一個更好的人
Not a bad movie, it felt sad and gave a good message, the animals thought he died ( some discovered he was alive) and he did not get recognized for what he did. What I am trying to say is that sometimes you won't get credit for what you do but the only thing that matters is that you know you great and have become a better person
···································································
我甚至不知道加布里埃爾·伊格萊西亞斯在《瘋狂的工作》系列或《北方的規范》中看到了什么。比起那些低質量的失敗,他更值得出演更好的電影。我只是很高興他至少能在皮克斯的《可可》中扮演一個小角色。但說真的,他為什么還要為這部續集費心留下來呢?-現代松糕
I don't even know what Gabriel Iglesias sees in The Nut Job series or Norm of the North. He's way more deserving of better movies to star in than those low-quality flops. I'm just glad he's going to at least be a minor role in Pixar's Coco. But seriously, why did he even bother to stay for the sequel to THIS? - ModernSpongeBobSucks
···································································
粗俗的情節,蹩腳的笑話,和容易忘記的角色,這就是堅果工作的公式!哦,別忘了加上一點江南風格,讓這種泔水更具災難性的味道!攪拌好并加熱3分鐘。然后,把這些垃圾從喉嚨里塞下去!試著享受吧!
Cheesy plot, lame jokes, and forgettable characters, that's the formula for the Nut Job! (Oh and don't forget to add a dash of Gangnam Style to give even more of a disastrous taste to this slop! ) Stir well and warm for 3 minutes. Then, have this trash literally shoved down your throat! Attempt to enjoy!
···································································
親愛的世界,我要用最美好的方式來表達這一點,但這部電影根本不值得去想!太高估了,我一次都沒笑過,甚至對孩子們都不好玩我是個孩子!這些角色都是勢利的,而蘇利是個以自我為中心的孩子!他的改變是如此的強迫,以至于我想把手機扔到墻上,但我不是一個以自我為中心的孩子!至于其他的角色。無聊,豬,和只是巨大的硬紙板剪紙在最后一秒打在一起一些角色甚至應該在電影的第一時間。我看到他們試圖使這部電影成為一個好的電影,但他們沒有努力!我是說,請你試試,沒那么難!現在來看看我最不喜歡的電影里的角色回顧吧!蘇莉:我知道,他是個以自我為中心的孩子,他改變主意毀了這部電影:無聊,無聊,無聊,無聊,插入這100倍的格雷森:太虛榮了!…更多
Dear world,I am going to say this in the nicest way possible, but this movie doesn't even deserve to be thought of! It's overrated, I didn't laugh once, not even amusing to kids (I am a kid)! And the characters are just plain snobby, and surley is a self centered brat! His change of heart is so forced it made me want to throw my phone against the wall, but I am not a self centered brat! As for the other characters. Boring, pigs, and are just huge cardboard cutouts slapped together last second (some of the characters should've even been in the movie in the first place). I see there trying to make this a good movie, but they didn't try very hard! I mean, please TRY, it's not that hard! Now for some character reviewing (which I do for meh least favorite movies)!Surley: I know, been there done that, but he is a self centered brat, and his change of heart just ruined the movieAndie: boring, boring, boring, boring, boring (insert this 100 times)Greyson: So vain! ... more
···································································
你是我見過的最好的兒童評論員!
You're the best child reviewer I've ever seen!
···································································
這就是我為什么留在90年代卡通網的原因。—ad48
That's why I stay to 90s Cartoon Network. - ad48
···································································
如果你還是個孩子,你必須年滿12歲或更小。所以我認為你才12歲。—戈德弗洛伊
To be a child still, you have to be 12 or younger. So I would say you are 12. - GodFlowey
0 篇文章
如果覺得我的文章對您有用,請隨意打賞。你的支持將鼓勵我繼續創作!