樓蘭(The Lorax)——歐美有史以來最差的動畫片

樓蘭(The Lorax)——歐美有史以來最差的動畫片在《歐美有史以來最差的動畫片》中排名第33名。我們精選了部分網友觀點： ...

樓蘭歐美有史以來最差的動畫片在歐美有史以來最差的動畫片中排名第33名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

我真的很喜歡這部電影。盡管我對蘇斯博士的作品沒有懷舊的記憶或喜愛，但我明白為什么人們不喜歡這部電影；它似乎使結局比經典電影更快樂。在原著中，它以一個把種子給孩子的種子結束了，有一點傷感的音符影響了觀眾。但是在重拍中，它以一首很好的快樂歌曲作為結尾，對觀眾沒有持久的影響。這就剝奪了原著中的信息：沒有人是壞人，我們都要對自己所做的事負責，不管我們是不是消費者或者是公司，如果我們不知道情況，我們最終會看到勞拉克斯留下來的世界。相反，我們得到了一個公司，他是整個故事的反面人物，有點毀了整個故事。老實說，我認為如果泰德和鎮上的人不參與這部電影的話，這將是一部好電影，一部更好的電影

I am honestly 'meh' with this movie. Even though I don't have a nostalgic memory or love to Dr Seuss' works, I get why people disliked this movie; it seemed to make the ending much happier than in the classic. In the original, it ended with the Oncler giving the seed to the kid, with a little sad note that impacts the viewers. But in the remake, it ended with a musical ending with a (pretty good) happy song that does not have a lasting impact to the viewers. This had stripped away the message from the original that, nobody is the villain, and that we are all responsible of what we've done, regardless if we are consumers or corporate, and if we are not aware of the situation, we will end up with the world that the Lorax left behind. Instead, we get a corporate who is the villain of the whole story, which had kind of ruined the whole entire story. Honestly, I think it would be a good and a better movie if Ted and the town weren't involved in the movie.

···································································

我和其他改編自書的電影一樣討厭勞拉克斯。這部動畫片色彩豐富，明快，把世界帶到了蘇斯博士充滿想象力的世界。然而，它沒有抓住蘇斯博士的精神。音樂的數字是樂觀的，令人愉快的，但不是我的東西。情節是新的，不同的，有點像書中的。但是，你知道，這不是一個警示性的故事，它缺乏微妙之處，最糟糕的還是角色，而且幾乎沒有什么事情讓我困惑：這部電影能指望多少成見？為什么要讓一個惡棍來做警示？這會讓積極的信息變得更好嗎？最后，那個曾經的角色怎么了？據我所知，他曾經是一個有趣的，可辨認的和復雜的角色，他是我的最愛。遺憾的是，他只是一個平淡無奇的吉他手，在2012年的《勞拉克斯》里約會過。我真不敢相信現在的人們對大多數作家的創造力都不尊重和認可。——TheRegular1227

I hate the Lorax as much as other book-to-film adaptations. The animation is colorful, bright and brings the world to Dr. Seuss' imaginative world. However, it failed to capture the spirit of Dr. Seuss. The musical numbers are upbeat, cheerful but not really my thing. The plot is new, different and somewhat resembles the book's. Yet, it isn't a cautionary tale as you know and it lacked the subtlety. Worst of all is still the characters, and there're few things confused me: How many stereotypes can you count on this movie? Why having a villain on a cautionary tale? Would that make the positive message better? Finally, what happened to the Once-ler character? He was once an interesting, indentifiable and complex character as far as I know, and he was my favorite. Sadly, he was nothing but a bland, guitar-playing, dated hipster in the 2012 Lorax. I can't believe how people these days have no respects and acknowledgements to most author's creativity. - TheRegular1227

···································································

我真的不敢相信《阿童木》比這堆糟糕透頂的廢話還糟糕。這是一部糟糕的改編，故事寫得很糟糕，討厭的人物和歌曲都會在你的腦海里停留太久，讓你上墻。去他媽的這堆馬糞

I genuinely cannot bloody believe that Astro Boy is ranked as worse than this terrible pile of crap. A terrible adaptation with a poorly written story, annoying characters and songs so bad they'll stick in your head long enough to drive you up a wall. To hell with this heap of horse dung.

···································································

很明顯，這是我看過的最糟糕的改編好的故事。只是……做一個在原來的勞拉克斯故事基礎上長大的人，然后再看“我能有多壞”的場景。你會被制作人對這本經典書背后的信息大肆屠殺而震驚得說不出話來。——xandermartin98

Easily the worst adaptation of a good story I've ever seen.Just...just be someone who grew up on the original Lorax story, and then watch the "How Bad Can I Be" scene. You will be shocked utterly speechless by how much the producers butchered the message behind this classic book. - xandermartin98

···································································

這是一部糟糕的電影。它是根據蘇斯博士的書改編的。所以，謝天謝地，我可以把它留在名單上。還有一首歌叫《讓它成長，更像是讓它死去》

As abysmal movie it is.It's officially based on the book by Dr. Seuss.So, thankfully, I could leave it here on the list.And there was a song called Let it Grow, More like Let it Die.

···································································

我真的很討厭原著中關于隱藏曾經的臉的強烈信息來展示惡棍是如何成為任何人，甚至是你，然后把它變成一個基本的，善與惡的場景

I really hate how it took the strong message of the original about hiding the Once-Lers face to show how the villain could be anyone, even you, and just turned it into a basic, good vs evil scenario

···································································

原著更好，有更好的情節，有更好的音樂，有更好的配音演員，而且有一個火腿三明治的預算。原著是一個經典，而這一個很糟糕。—豆瓣343

The original was better, had a better plot, had better music, had better voice actors, and had the budget of a ham sandwich.The original is a classic and this one sucks. - BeanBag343

···································································

如此的說教和遺忘，以至于在一年半之后我才聽說Onceler的粉絲們：+/

So preachy and forgettable that it didn't cross my mind once after seeing it until I heard about the Onceler fandom like a year and a half later :/

···································································

小時候和成年人都喜歡這本書和特別節目，但這部電影毀了我童年的另一部分

Loved the book and the special as a kid and as an adult. But with this film it destroyed yet another part of my childhood

···································································

它試圖忠實于這本書，但是失敗了。好吧，至少電影結尾的信息看起來不錯

It tries to be faithful to the book, but failed. Well, at least that message at the end of the movie seems to be nice.