君主制(Monarchism)——歐美最壞的政治意識形態

君主制(Monarchism)——歐美最壞的政治意識形態在《歐美最壞的政治意識形態》中排名第30名。我們精選了部分網友觀點： ...

君主制歐美最壞的政治意識形態在歐美最壞的政治意識形態中排名第30名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

君主政體，尤其是君主專制主義，比君主專制主義更容易導致君主專制，法國君主制肯定比暴虐的共和黨人接管政權后發生的恐怖和屠殺文德王朝的統治要好

Monarchy, especially a constitutional monarchy with executive powers reserved to the monarch is a great idea. Much better than democracy, which always leads to national debt, demagogues, and corruption. And to the poster above, the French monarchy was certainly better than the Reign of Terror and massacre of the Vend茅e that happened after the sadistic Republicans took over.

···································································

一位瑞典女王辭職成為了一名修女。許多皇室成員根本不關心政治。有時皇室無能，出現混亂。你可以用君主立憲制來解決這一問題，但這確實效率低下

A swedish queen quitted and became a nun. Many royalties don't care about politics at all. And sometimes the royalty is incompetent and has a disorder. You can fix that with constitutional monarchy but that is really inefficient.

···································································

缺乏現代的例子？瑞典、比利時、西班牙、英國等國今天仍然是君主國。他們在工作嗎？是的，但是對那些住在那些國家的人來說要花很多錢。他們什么都不做就得得到報酬

A lack of modern examples? Sweden, Belgium, Spain, Great Britain etc... are still today monarchies. Are they working? Yes, but it cost a LOT of money to the people who live in those countries. They get paid for doing nothing.

···································································

現代社會的例子并不多見，但在法國卻完全失敗了

There is a lack of modern day examples. But in france it was a total fail.

···································································

有好國王。但是皇室的腐敗程度只是…我想是下一個級別-麥克弗拉格勞德

There are good kings. But the level of corruption in royality is just... next level I guess - MChkflaguard_Yt