·······································································
···································································
我很慚愧地說,我曾經相信饑餓游戲是一個杰作。然后我讀了這篇文章。然后我又讀了很多其他反烏托邦的杰作,包括奔跑的人,勇敢的新世界,1984,這些都是不可思議的,順便說一句,還有很多很多很多。饑餓游戲是早前的垃圾!相信我-我曾經是一個超級粉絲。但是回過頭來看,我覺得自己太蠢了,因為我喜歡它。它只是一堆蹩腳的浪漫和拙劣的角色。環境是一般的,反派軟弱。另一方面,戰斗皇家是難以置信的寫了非常發達的字符。在饑餓游戲中,我們什么都不知道順便說一句,除了卡蒂斯之外,任何人都沒有理由為他們的死感到難過。見鬼,他們中的一些人甚至連名字都沒有。在《皇家爭霸》中,當角色死去時,你會感到難過,因為每個人都有詳細的背景故事,以防你不知道,呃…還有差不多的
I am very ashamed to say that I once believed that the Hunger Games was a masterpiece. And then I read this. And then I read a plethora of other dystopian masterpieces, including The Running Man, Brave New World, 1984 (which were all incredible, by the way), and many, MANY more. The Hunger Games is preteen garbage! Believe me - I used to be a huge fan. But looking back, I feel stupid for ever liking it. It's just a bunch of crappy romance and poorly written characters. The environment was generic and the villain weak. Battle Royale on the other hand is incredibly written with VERY developed characters. In Hunger Games we don't learn anything about anyone except Katniss (who is a horrible character, by the way), so there's really no reason to feel bad for them when they meet their demises. Hell, some of them don't even get names. In Battle Royale, you feel bad when characters die because EVERYONE gets a detailed backstory (in case you aren't aware, THG and BR have pretty much the same ... more
···································································
在這和饑餓游戲之間很難。人們總是說他們太相似了。我讀了這兩本書,真的有太多的不同。兩本都很棒,都是10本書,但這本書由于更多的動作和刺激而戰勝了它
It was hard between this and the hunger games. People always say they are so alike. I read both, and there really are so many differences. Both are great, both are 10/10 books, but this one beats it out a little more due to more action and thrill.
0 篇文章
如果覺得我的文章對您有用,請隨意打賞。你的支持將鼓勵我繼續創作!