• <noscript id="ecgc0"><kbd id="ecgc0"></kbd></noscript>
    <menu id="ecgc0"></menu>
  • <tt id="ecgc0"></tt>

    谷歌(Google)——歐美十大最差搜索引擎

    谷歌(Google)——歐美十大最差搜索引擎 在 《歐美十大最差搜索引擎》 中排名第11名。 我們精選了部分網友觀點: ...

    谷歌歐美十大最差搜索引擎在歐美十大最差搜索引擎中排名第11名。



    ·······································································

    我們精選了部分網友觀點:

    ···································································


    是的,谷歌最近幾年發生了一些事情。有一次你可以在谷歌上得到一個非常深入的信息搜索。這對試圖找到最難理解的編程錯誤的答案的軟件程序員來說很有用。這似乎是一種趨勢,從大約十年前的2000年中后期開始,由谷歌的開發者們從深層次轉變為“相關的”。你可以在一些網絡搜索中看到這一點,有一條消息說,有些鏈接沒有顯示,因為它們不“相關”。問題是,相關的是某人的意見。我認為關于谷歌在信息處理方面體現了最前沿的觀點,比如在人工智能等領域。但在我看來,谷歌對搜索結果進行優先排序的方式是基于90%的網絡流量——受歡迎程度。這并不完全是一個震驚世界的想法,對吧?另外10%似乎是“相關性”的東西,這……更多


    Yes, something has happened to Google in recent years. At one time you could get a very deep information search on Google. This is useful, for example, for software programmers trying to find answers to the most difficult, recondite programming bugs. There seems to be a trend, starting about ten years ago (mid to late 2000's) by the Google developers to transform from deep to "relevant." You can see this for yourself on some web searches, there is a message stating that some links were not shown because they were not "relevant." The problem is that what is relevant is someone's opinion. I think there is some kind of urban myth out there that Google embodies the cutting edge in information processing, as in artificial intelligence and the like. But it looks to me that the way Google prioritizes hits on a search is based about 90 percent on web traffic volume--popularity. That's not exactly a world shaking idea, is it? And the other ten percent seems to be the "relevance" thing, which ... more

    ···································································


    糟糕的谷歌將垃圾湯從你的關鍵詞中凝結出來,所以只有5個關鍵詞排在了榜首。最糟糕的是關聯度已經下降了好幾年了。這太令人沮喪了,“把文本放進引號里以迫使你找到”已經行不通了。同時,重復一些單詞也能讓你的關鍵詞更具相關性,但現在不是了,谷歌掃蕩垃圾湯-出了點問題。在英國或美國買一個玩具是不可能的-這會迫使當地銷售,忽視你在英國或美國的選擇-一英里高的蟲子塔,沒有反饋讓他們知道。政治正確性算法正在發揮作用,他們是與學術和科學事實背道而馳的是永恒和永恒的-谷歌就像一只死老鼠在你的地板上-它臭烘烘的PC沒有希望恢復。缺乏反饋等同于死羅馬皇帝誰認為他們是神的傲慢


    TERRIBLE GOOGLE coagulates garbage soup out of your key words so that only the 5HIT floats to the top of the list. Worst of all is the level of relevance has been down for years. It is so frustrating and "putting text in quotes to force a find" - does not work anymore. Also repeating words worked at one time to force relevance, but not anymore - Google sweeps together garbage soup - something has gone wrong. Try to buy a toy in the UK or US when in another country is impossible - it forces local region sales and ignores your UK or US options - A TOWER OF BUGS A MILE HIGH AND NO FEEDBACK TO LET THEM KNOW. Political correctness algorithms are kicking in and they are acting against both academic and scientific facts that are timeless and last forever - google is like a dead rat in your floorboards it stinks of PC without hope of recovery. The lack of feedback is equal to the arrogance of dead Roman emperors who thought they were gods.

    ···································································


    谷歌已經吸了很長一段時間了。你搜索的每一個東西都會有一個購買東西的鏈接。即使你已經有了你要找的東西。它不再搜索詞組了,只是一些隨機的單詞,比如單詞soup,即使你把你要找的東西放在報價單上,它也不會查到你要找的東西。谷歌是一個邪惡的公司,它只想和那些貪財的公司合作,向你推銷你不想要或不需要的產品


    Google has sucked for a very long time now. Everything you search brings up some a link to purchase something. Even if you already have the thing you're looking up. It doesn't search phrases any more just random words, like word soup, even if you put what you're searching for in quotations it still won't look up what your looking for. Google is a evil corporate sale out only interested in working with money grubbing corporations to sell you products that you don't want or don't need.

    ···································································


    谷歌是唯一一家可以引進“新的和改進的”功能,同時刪除功能和可用性的公司。只是在未來重新引入這些功能作為新的,因為它們沒有真正的功能。他們“重新發明”15年前的功能,并將其作為新的市場。谷歌的搜索結果糟透了用標點符號來修飾搜索結果現在是無效的


    Google is the ONLY company who can introduce a "New and Improved" and take away features and remove usability at the same time. Only to reintroduce those features as new in the future because they have no genuine features. They 'reinvent" features that are 15 years old and market them as new. Google's search results SUCK. The use of punctuation to hone search results is NOW INEFFECTIVE.

    ···································································


    他們的產品不僅是垃圾,Chrome不僅行為完全像一個病毒,他們不僅故意操縱和忽略最高出價者和他們的政治同伙的搜索結果,而且他們還積極地監視和記錄他們的用戶的所有信息為國家安全局,然后公開吹噓,好像這是一個功能世界上最糟糕、最不道德的公司


    Not only is their product garbage, not only does Chrome behave EXACTLY like a virus, not only do they intentionally rig and omit search results for the highest bidder and their political bedmates, but they also actively spy on and log all of their users' information for the NSA and then openly boast about it like it's a feature.Google is one of the worst, most amoral companies in the world.

    ···································································


    僅從搜索的有效性和避免政治討論來衡量,谷歌是最有效的返回我要找的東西。我理解人們對隱私的擔憂,但在大多數情況下,它追蹤的信息是一種叫做“關聯性”的東西


    Measured on the effectiveness of the search alone and avoiding political discussions Google is hands down the most effective at returning what I am looking for. I understand the concerns about privacy but in most cases the information it tracks is part of a thing called _relevancy_.

    ···································································


    谷歌改變了我正在搜索的詞,即使我把它們放在引號里,然后給我幾十個不相關的結果,因為它不能再正確地搜索了。他們在幾年前就失去了這種能力,從那以后一直在下滑


    Google changes the words I am searching for even if I put them in quotes then gives me dozens of non-related results because it cannot search correctly any longer. They lost the ability several years ago and are sliding downhill ever since.

    ···································································


    沒有人能打敗谷歌。谷歌是最糟糕的!當你搜索一本烹飪書時,結果只是大量的垃圾郵件,而不是你真正要搜索的東西!谷歌上的搜索很煩人!


    No one can beat google. GOOGLE IS THE WORST...! When you search for a cook book, the results are just TONS of SPAM and NOTHING of what you are really searching! The search on google is very annoying..!

    ···································································


    很長一段時間以來,我一直在使用谷歌。最近我了解到了谷歌的秘密。老實說,這聽起來很有戲劇性,但我覺得自己被欺騙了。所以,我找到了DuckDuckGo,決定試試看。太棒了!我


    For an extremely long time, I had Google. I've learned all about its dark secret lately. Honestly, this is going to sound dramatic, but I felt tricked. So, I found DuckDuckGo and decided to give it a try. It's amazing! I

    ···································································


    谷歌曾經是最好的。現在他們只給你提供贊助的結果,不管它是否有標記。更糟糕的是,他們破壞了布爾搜索,所以你得到了很多你以前可以過濾掉的結果


    Google used to be the best. Now they just feed you sponsored results, whether it's marked as such or not. Worse, they've crippled boolean search so you get a lot of results that you used to be able to filter out.

    • 發表于 2021-01-12 17:52
    • 閱讀 ( 562 )
    • 分類:互聯網

    你可能感興趣的文章

    相關問題

    0 條評論

    請先 登錄 后評論
    admin
    admin

    0 篇文章

    作家榜 ?

    1. xiaonan123 189 文章
    2. 湯依妹兒 97 文章
    3. luogf229 46 文章
    4. jy02406749 45 文章
    5. 小凡 34 文章
    6. Daisy萌 32 文章
    7. 我的QQ3117863681 24 文章
    8. 華志健 23 文章

    推薦文章

    聯系我們:uytrv@hotmail.com 問答工具
  • <noscript id="ecgc0"><kbd id="ecgc0"></kbd></noscript>
    <menu id="ecgc0"></menu>
  • <tt id="ecgc0"></tt>
    久久久久精品国产麻豆