• <noscript id="ecgc0"><kbd id="ecgc0"></kbd></noscript>
    <menu id="ecgc0"></menu>
  • <tt id="ecgc0"></tt>

    堂·布拉德曼最佳板球運動員鮑威爾·鮑威爾(Don Bradman (Best Cricketers)PowellPowell)——歐美人最值得1號各自+ u2018Best人運動+ u2018列表

    堂布拉德曼最佳板球運動員鮑威爾鮑威爾(Don Bradman (Best Cricketers)PowellPowell)——歐美人最值得1號各自+ u2018Best人運動+ u2018列表 在 《歐美人最值得1號各自+ u2018Best人運動+ u2018列表》 中排名第10名。 ...

    堂·布拉德曼最佳板球運動員鮑威爾·鮑威爾(Don Bradman (Best Cricketers) Powell Powell)——歐美人最值得1號各自+ u2018Best人運動+ u2018列表在歐美人最值得號各自人運動列表中排名第10名。



    ·······································································

    我們精選了部分網友觀點:

    ···································································


    有趣的是,我對板球幾乎一無所知,但是這個人的個人簡歷上寫著他是歷史上無可爭議的最好的擊球手,無論是從統計學上還是從其他方面來說。現在,我對板球運動了解不多,這就引出了無數的問題,首先,向擊球手投球的人有什么優勢嗎?例如,這些球員是否會像棒球投手那樣改變速度和位置,試圖欺騙擊球手?或者球只是以盡可能大的力度扔給擊球手?在任何情況下,在任何運動中辯論山羊的部分樂趣在于,不僅有可供參考的統計數據,還有比賽中的關鍵時刻,通常是比賽后期的“關鍵”時刻,可以定義球員的遺產。不管怎樣,這家伙聽起來好像他主宰了板球擊球,以至于沒有辯論,令人印象深刻


    Interesting. I know next to nothing about Cricket, but the man's attached bio reads like he is the undisputed best batsman in history, statistically or otherwise. Now, me not knowing much of the sport begs a myriad of questions, first and foremost, does the guy that throws to the batsman have any advantages? For instance, do these players change speeds and location in an attempt to deceive the batsman, like baseball pitchers do? Or is the ball just hurled at the batsman with as much force as possible? In any case, part of the fun to debate the GOAT in any sport is that there are not only statistics that can be referenced, but critical moments in contests, the "clutch" moments, usually late in games, that can define a players legacy... Anyways, this guy sounds as if he dominated Cricket batting to such a degree that there is no debate, and that's impressive.

    ···································································


    關于誰是第二棒的板球擊球手有很多爭論,但是每個人都知道他是最好的。他以99.94的測試平均分退役了。第二高的得分只有60分多一點。有人說“只要澳大利亞有布拉德曼,她將是無敵的。現在幾乎是時候要求法律限制板球運動員的數量了。”布拉德曼應該被允許跑壘。”他在最后一局的得分是0,當時他只需要4分就可以獲得100分的終身平均分,但這實際上是唯一證明他是凡人的東西。我不是一個超級板球迷,澳大利亞是我的敵人,但盡管如此,他可能是歷史上最具統治力的球員任何主要運動項目。-鮑威爾


    There is a lot of debate over who was the 2nd best cricket batsman but everyone knows that he was the best. He retired with a test average score of 99.94 (the second highest ever was only a little over 60). It was said "As long as Australia has Bradman she will be invincible ... It is almost time to request a legal limit on the number of runs Bradman should be allowed to make." He scored 0 in his final innings when he only needed a score of 4 to have a 100 lifetime average but this was practically the only thing that showed he was mortal. I am not a huge Cricket fan and Australia are the enemy for me but nonetheless he probably was the most dominant player in the history of any major sport. - Powell

    ···································································


    但在最棒的板球運動員名單上,他是第二名……——科學愛好者10


    But on the list of best cricketers, he's number 2 ... - scienceLover10

    ···································································


    我想我說大家都知道他是有史以來最好的,這是在夸大其詞。我要說的是,每個了解板球的人都認為他是有史以來最好的。這個名單是不是只給那些已經在他們的體育最佳名單上排名第一的人,如果是這樣的話,我很抱歉加入他。-鮑威爾


    I guess I was exaggerating by saying that everyone knows he was the best ever. Ill rephrase that everyone who knows cricket considers him the best ever. Is this list only for people who are already at number one on their sports best list if so I apologise for adding him. - Powell

    ···································································


    是的,沒關系,我可以把他說成是一個事實錯誤-科學愛好者10


    yeah it is, its okay I can just report him as a factual error - scienceLover10

    ···································································


    哦,對不起。-鮑威爾


    Oh. Sorry. - Powell

    • 發表于 2021-03-26 22:11
    • 閱讀 ( 660 )
    • 分類:體育

    你可能感興趣的文章

    相關問題

    0 條評論

    請先 登錄 后評論
    admin
    admin

    0 篇文章

    作家榜 ?

    1. xiaonan123 189 文章
    2. 湯依妹兒 97 文章
    3. luogf229 46 文章
    4. jy02406749 45 文章
    5. 小凡 34 文章
    6. Daisy萌 32 文章
    7. 我的QQ3117863681 24 文章
    8. 華志健 23 文章

    推薦文章

    聯系我們:uytrv@hotmail.com 問答工具
  • <noscript id="ecgc0"><kbd id="ecgc0"></kbd></noscript>
    <menu id="ecgc0"></menu>
  • <tt id="ecgc0"></tt>
    久久久久精品国产麻豆