有線電視幾乎沒有完全被流媒體服務和直播電視所取代(Cable TV wasn‘t being replaced almost completely by streaming services and live TVjoshthegeekynerd)——歐美2005年是最后一個好年景的原因

有線電視幾乎沒有完全被流媒體服務和直播電視所取代(Cable TV wasn't being replaced almost completely by streaming services and live TVjoshthegeekynerd)——歐美2005年是最后一個好年景的原因在《歐美2005年是最后一個好年景的原因》中排名第4名。 ...

有線電視幾乎沒有完全被流媒體服務和直播電視所取代(Cable TV wasn't being replaced almost completely by streaming services and live TV joshthegeekynerd)——歐美2005年是最后一個好年景的原因在歐美年是最后一個好年景的原因中排名第4名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

所以，是的，我一輩子都喜歡有線電視，我總是喜歡擁有盡可能多的頻道。我希望有線電視和衛星電視能繼續存在，特別是對有錢人來說，他們買得起，但有線電視正被電視直播和流媒體所取代，越來越多的人取消了訂閱。我不明白的是，如果有線電視真的消失了，為什么有錢人仍然買不到有線電視。我的意思是，有錢人買得起，這意味著他們應該買得起有線電視，而不是把它花在一堆其他更貴的東西上，這些東西會把你的錢都花光。—喬什·基尼

So, yeah, I've loved cable for all my life, and I always like having as many channels as possible. I wish that cable and satellite would stay, especially for richer people who can afford it, but cable is being replaced with live TV and streaming, and more and more people are unsubscribing. What I don't get is why rich people can't still get cable if cable DOES disappear. I mean, the rich people can afford it, and that means that they should be able to get it rather than spend it on a bunch of other even more expensive stuff that uses up all your money. - joshthegeekynerd