·······································································
···································································
我很確定這在技術上是不正確的。雖然這項法律沒有被特別廢除,但新的法律覆蓋了舊的法律,根據新的法律,這將被視為襲擊甚至謀殺未遂。—鮑威爾
I am pretty sure this isn't technically true. Although this law has not been specifically revoked newer laws overwrite older laws and this is would count as assault or even attempted murder under newer laws.. - Powell
···································································
是的,現在是否有人真的有弓弩是有爭議的。它起源于蘇格蘭和英格蘭之間存在極端敵對關系的時代,被視為自我保護
Yes - and whether anyone actually has crossbows these days is debatable. It originated from times where there was an extremely hostile relationship between Scotland and England, and would have been seen as self-protection. - FefeCat
0 篇文章
如果覺得我的文章對您有用,請隨意打賞。你的支持將鼓勵我繼續創作!