步槍歐美十佳突擊步槍在歐美十佳突擊步槍中排名第8名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

The M16 is the best rifle, no doubt. The AK47 is nowhere near the top spot and I can prove it. The M16 is lighter than the AK47, so you can carry more ammunition. The M16 has a higher rate of fire 950 rpm than the AK47600 rpm, so you can get more lead down range and you have a better chance of getting the enemy. The M16 has much higher range, as you are able to hit a point\/bullseye target at 1804 feet 550 m, while an AK47 cannot hit an area target at 330 feet 100 m. This was proven in the Youtube video called " AK47 vs M16 Part 1". Also the M16 is has very low recoil, while the AK47 kicks like a mule. The only advantages the AK47 has are lesser jamming and power. However, the M16 is very close to these two advantages, as it's hard to jam and has a much faster bullet indicating power so it is still reliable in both situations. There is no possible way an AK47 is better than this. - m16lion9460 quot;The M16 is lighter than the AK47, so you can carry more ammunition. quot; The M16 weighs more than the AKM, and you really cannot carry more than 12 mags for either weapon. quot;The M16 has a higher rate of fire 950 rpm than the AK47600 rpm, so you can get more lead down range and you have a better chance of getting the enemy quot; The rate of fire difference just makes the M16 uncontrollable when used on full automatic. But regardless they aren't and won't be used in that way so a lower rof is actually desirable in a rifle. quot;The M16 has much higher range, as you are able to hit a point\/bullseye target at 1804 feet 550 m, while an AK47 cannot hit an area target at 330 feet 100 m. quot; I saw a few Americans try this in Afghanistan, it isn't a realistic goal and you'll waste ammunition trying to do it. Though assume you do hit the target at that range, the 5.56mm round has lost so much energy it'll be useless. As for the AK-47 range listed. Area target range is 4.5x that, and point target range is 3x greater than the dishonest number you provide. quot;This was proven in the YouTube video called quot; AK47 vs M16 Part 1 quot;. There are a lot of videos by that title, most are purposefully dishonest and dismissible. quot; Also the M16 is has very low recoil quot; True and that is an advantage, but for a combat rifle the tradeoff in reliability from the use of direct impingement should be scolded. Unfortunately there are some really awesome American soldiers I knew in Afghanistan who died because of that systems failures. quot;while the AK47 kicks like a mule. quot; While kicks like a mule is definitely a subjective standard, I think it's a dishonest way to phrase it. The AK-47 has harder recoil than the M16 yes, but it is not hard at all. A small framed inexperienced shooter could easily control it. A weapon that does kick like a mule is a Mauser 98. Or any full rifle cartridge weapon really. quot;However, the M16 is very close to these two advantages, as it's hard to jam and has a much faster bullet indicating power so it is still reliable in both situations. quot; No it isn't hard to jam, at all, American soldiers encountered jams very quickly and commonly. Even very early in firefights. Velocity does not indicate power, that doesn't even make sense to think that. Joules and bullet weight is a better way to measure power of a round. It refers to the energy delivered to the target and the mass of the object delivered. 1,679 J and 4g for the 5.56mm round and 2,108 J and 7.9g for the 7.62mm. Obviously there are other rounds with different performances but these are a decent sample of it, and judging by just the numbers that matter your claim of more powerful bullet is false. quot;There is no possible way an AK47 is better than this. quot; I'm sorry dude, I know it is a hurt for your nationalist feelings, but the M16 is worse. Combat experience all over the world and for many decades shows this over and over again.你的不誠實的護教學一個平庸的步槍不改變現實.

The M16 is the best rifle, no doubt. The AK47 is nowhere near the top spot and I can prove it. The M16 is lighter than the AK47, so you can carry more ammunition. The M16 has a higher rate of fire (950 rpm) than the AK47(600 rpm), so you can get more lead down range and you have a better chance of getting the enemy. The M16 has much higher range, as you are able to hit a point/bullseye target at 1804 feet (550 m), while an AK47 cannot hit an area target at 330 feet (100 m). This was proven in the Youtube video called " AK47 vs M16 Part 1". Also the M16 is has very low recoil, while the AK47 kicks like a mule. The only advantages the AK47 has are lesser jamming and power. However, the M16 is very close to these two advantages, as it's hard to jam and has a much faster bullet (indicating power) so it is still reliable in both situations. There is no possible way an AK47 is better than this. The M-16 works great in a battle. It does need cleaning like all guns do (other than AK's I guess) but you clean your gun between battles. The m16 is light and easy to carry 99% of the time your lugging this thing around... It's also accurate so you can hit what your shooting at... Not just spray bullets like the AK... And my real reason for voting for the M16... The AK does not fit comfortable for me to shoot.. It's the most uncomfortable piece of junk I've ever shot.. I have to pull the little stock ( made for little people? ) right up to my face then the shells almost hit me in the face when they come out. The sights are not as nice as the M16... I bought the AR15 $1600 triple the money an ak costs... But I wanted a gun that was fun to shoot... Not something that is built to just spray bullets The M16 has to be the finest assault rifle the world has ever seen and all of the rifles that have been made on the 16's frame are a testament to this fact. Although the AK is a wonderful rifle at close range it is not the be all due all that a weapon going into battle needs to be. Yes, I know the horror stories about the M16 but these go back to the early days of development and have no bases for the rifle used today. One other problem has been the US military asking to much of the design as in the M4 with a gas block placed to close to the receiver causing many problems but the M4 is not the M16 and that fact is often over looked. Could the M16 be improved with adding a simple piston system and high tech dry lube coatings, well yes! But over all the military can find no weapon the is truly leaps and bounds above the M16 or they would buy it. With the way we spend money on the military, spending big bucks for a finer weapon is not a concern. But someone has to build it first. M16 should top this list, it is a very reliable weapon. It has been dulled down from back in the day, by which I mean using a smaller round, in order to be humane. But the United States marine corps use this weapon and it has yet to let us down. Less fire power than the ak but can put 30 well aimed, tight group shots wherever we need to, that doesn't matter. It also uses a 223 and has the rep of being the most deadly round, due to the fact it doesn't just stop in the body, if it hits a bone, it's a pinball machine. Nothing left of the enemy. Ooh-rah!

···································································

m - 16是偉大的戰斗。它需要清洗和所有槍除了AK的我想但是你清潔你的槍之間的斗爭。m16很輕,便于攜帶99?0的時候你的拖著這個東西…這也是準確的,這樣你就可以達到你的射擊…不僅噴霧子彈像AK…和我的真正原因在投票m16…正義與發展黨不適合舒適為我拍攝. .這是我拍過最不舒服的垃圾。我不得不把小股票為小人嗎?直到我的臉那么殼幾乎擊中了我的臉當他們出來。景色不一樣漂亮的M16…我AR15 1600美元的三倍的錢買一個ak成本…但我想要一把槍,是有趣的拍攝…不是建立噴霧子彈

···································································

M16是世界上最好的突擊步槍和所有的步槍,已經16的框架是一個證明這個事實。盡管正義與發展黨是一個美妙的槍近距離并不是都是由于所有的武器進入戰斗需要。是的,我知道關于M16的恐怖故事,但這些回到早期的發展和今天沒有基地使用的步槍。另一個問題是美國軍方要求的設計在M4氣塊放置接近接收機造成許多問題但M4不是M16,事實往往是在M16。可以提高與添加一個簡單的活塞系統和高科技干潤滑涂料,是的!但在所有軍事找不到武器上面確實是跳躍的M16或者他們會購買它。我們把錢花在軍事、花大錢更好的武器并不是一個問題。但有人先構建它。實際上并不是很多步槍使用M16的內部,只是因此其中一些特性有一個原因,我猜你只是忽略了恐怖故事是來自瓦納特就在幾年前,巨大的相關性實際上現在使用的m4和M16步槍。美國軍方已測試的武器數量飛速地更好,主要就是金錢上和腐敗。我們寧愿花哨昂貴的新飛機比一個可靠有效的步槍不工作。

···································································

M16應該上這個列表,這是一個非常可靠的武器。它已經削弱了從早在一天,我的意思是使用一個小圓,為了人道,但美國海軍陸戰隊使用這種武器,它還沒有讓我們失望。沒有正義與發展黨火力但是可以把30目的,嚴格組織無論我們需要,沒關系,還使用了一個223的代表是最致命的,因為它不只是停止在體內,如果擊中骨頭,這是一個彈球機。一無所有的敵人。Ooh-rah !

···································································

基本上只是選擇火版本的ar - 15的意思你可以轉換成你想要的任何類型的槍。你要氣活塞嗎?你明白了。你想要6.5格倫德爾?你明白了。你想讓火快嗎?是的。慢嗎?是的。你想要得到一個可折疊的股票?當然,給你。你需要范圍嗎?哦是的。你想要不同的雜志嗎?你可以用任何你想要的槍男孩…炮口制退器嗎?是的。你得到你們自己的M16因為這是軍隊ar - 15.的M16突擊步槍,ar - 15不是。

···································································

我用m16和ak47、對我來說m16優勝者,對不同的東西都有用但m16更快更準確,可以殺死,一個很好的例子,在2003 - 5政府派出一組調查人員以確保我們沒有執行恐怖分子用大頭照,作為結果,我們拍攝的恐怖分子從遠的距離,這些恐怖分子可能使用部,也有人說它堵塞,是的如果你不打掃你的武器愚蠢的驢

···································································

M16更好我的意思是它有重量輕精度和范圍。有些人認為5.56 x45口徑小。沒關系,如果你有一個小子彈你可能不殺了他們,但你可以傷害他們,就地處決。有些人就是談論大小的子彈是真正重要的,但它不是。有些人說精度并不重要,它。如果你不打擊你的敵人。你就完蛋了。我仍將是世界上最好的突擊步槍。

···································································

人類歷史上最具影響力的武器之一。現代突擊步槍的先鋒設計,它包含許多功能從未見過在以前的步槍,,可以說,\ \ u2018 u2018gun改變了歷史。雖然它確實有它的缺點,它超過補償他們神奇的技術。建立連續近50年數以百計的變體——一個見證偉大的設計。他們不叫它\ u2018Space步槍\ u2018免費!

···································································

你們想知道為什么M16將主宰戰場嗎?不告訴你為什么m16更長、更輕、更準確,并平鋪better.讓開始準確性我會很高興站200碼遠,有人試圖打我一個AK.你知道為什么嗎?因為不能打我!我不會站500碼,和讓別人試著打我M16。現在正義與發展黨更可靠,但是相信我,如果我的一次交火中,我不需要擔心我的槍被坦克碾過,但那只是我的如果你的步槍在交火中被坦克碾過,你應該死,只是可憐。1最后一個原因,如果美國軍隊裝備M16,馬上應該是最好的突擊步槍的你的回答。我并不是說,正義與發展黨是一個糟糕的槍!這是一個很好的槍近距離格斗和它真正的它不會干擾你,但這不是什么id查找在我assualt步槍。我希望你們同意…更多

···································································

The M16 is more reliable, more accurate, is the favorite of the US, and we believe that the AK-47 represents the evil of our enemies。 The US rather use the last M16 in the world with one magazine than use an AK-47。 Yes, the AK-47 does well in certain climates, but once again the M16 is more accurate and is more reliable。 This rifle is very easy to handle and fire while the AK-47 is just plain out of control when fired。 show more comments darr;