干城章嘉峰(Kangchenjunga)——歐美十大最危險登山

干城章嘉峰(Kangchenjunga)——歐美十大最危險登山在《歐美十大最危險登山》中排名第5名。我們精選了部分網友觀點： ...

干城章嘉峰歐美十大最危險登山在歐美十大最危險登山中排名第5名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

我同意…瘋狂的天氣冷…雪崩,有時不用繩子爬. .沒有安全或簡單的路線,山,到處都是崎嶇的地形。第三高峰也使它更加危險。我不得不把這山在前2的危險。這并不是減少安納普爾納峰或K2,他們仍然可怕爬應對和K2相當技術。所以干城章嘉峰雖然. .

I agree...cold crazy weather...Avalanches, climbing without ropes at times...there is no safe or easy route up that mountain, there is rough terrain everywhere. Its also the third highest peak which makes it even more dangerous...I would have to put this mountain in the top 2 in terms of danger...This is not to diminish Annapurna or K2, as they are still scary climbs to tackle and K2 is quite technical. So is Kanchenjunga though...

···································································

呼應一個評論者暗示的安納普爾納峰銆傘?+ u2018guys,我建議你做一些研究在投票前+ u2018銆侫nnapurna我任何山高是危險的,但干城章嘉峰更危險銆俆安納普爾納峰他統計數據被用來投票為1950年至今,包括嘗試比現在可以大大減少復雜的設備——干城章嘉峰1990后的統計數據顯示,這是唯一的8000 +山峰之一沒有更容易與死亡率超過22?vs爬20?AnnapurnaI銆?

To echo one of the commenter's suggesting Annapurna... "guys, I suggest you do a bit of a research before voting".Annapurna I (as any mountain that high) is dangerous, but Kanchenjunga is more dangerous.The statistics being used to vote for Annapurna are for 1950-present, which includes attempts with significantly less sophisticated equipment than is now available - the stats for Kanchenjunga post-1990 show that it's the only one of the 8000M+ peaks that hasn't become easier to climb (with death rate over 22% vs under 20% for AnnapurnaI).