漢尼拔巴薩(Hannibal Barca)——歐美歷屆十大軍事將領

漢尼拔巴薩(Hannibal Barca)——歐美歷屆十大軍事將領在《歐美歷屆十大軍事將領》中排名第4名。我們精選了部分網友觀點： ...

漢尼拔巴薩歐美歷屆十大軍事將領在歐美歷屆十大軍事將領中排名第4名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

輝煌。戰斗之銳氣是一個杰作。一旦被困在一個山谷晚上大羅馬部隊由欺騙了羅馬人誤以為他要收取他們把火把牛并送出谷向羅馬。羅馬人帶著他們的所有軍隊的地方他們認為他嘗試突破,他離開了山谷的路線他們剛剛離開打開他搬到幫助他們的朋友。Trasimene湖是一塊神奇的欺騙。當他的人幾乎擊敗羅馬,他也是偽造的人在我們記住它的帝國戰爭的火災。他們學習的策略,從他給了他們一個帝國。

Brilliant general. Battle of Cannae was a masterpiece. Once was trapped in a valley at night by a larger Roman force got out by tricking the Romans into thinking he was going to charge them by tying torches to oxen and sending them out the valley towards the Romans. Romans brought all their troops to the place they thought he was about to try break through while he left the valley by a route they had just left open to him as they moved to help their friends. Battle of Lake Trasimene was a amazing piece of deception. While he was the man who almost beat Rome, he was also the one who forged it in to the empire we remember it as in the fires of his war with them. They learnt the tactics that gave them an empire from him.

···································································

看我的朋友。當你不知道的東西…不賴特廢話一些微牛不是cannea. cannea之戰是在巴勒塔附近,漢尼拔大地是平的,這樣可以在包絡和cavallery manuvre羅馬羅馬軍團的支持。請在你賴特一些東西. .做一個小研究。再見

Look my friends... When you don't know something... Don't wright nonsense the one whit oxen was not the battle of cannea. the battle of cannea was near barletta and the land was flat so that hannibal could manuvre the roman in to a envelopment and cavallery to back of the roman legion... Please before you wright some thing... Do a small reaserch. Ciao

···································································

這個天才戰勝強大的羅馬帝國后獲得了勝利。作為一個軍事一般不等于這個人。他應該在列表的頂部,結合各種不同種族的戰士成一個特級和有效的軍隊。他充分利用地形和伏擊。他研究他的對手,因此知道他的敵人之前接觸他們。以上一切他的戰術使他贏得戰斗。這家伙是愛因斯坦的軍事戰爭。如果孫子當時戰爭的作家圣經漢尼拔巴薩就是耶穌基督。他能消滅整個軍隊。如果系統在迦太基是由類似于羅馬帝國沒有什么能夠阻止漢尼拔巴薩。唯一阻止漢尼拔是缺乏支持他迦太基。一個剛剛調查他的戰役之一,每個人都同意,他應該在這個列表。

This genius gained victory after victory against the mighty Roman Empire. As a military general none is equal to this man. He should be on top of the list. He combined various warriors from different races into one superieur and effective army. He made good use of terrain and laid ambushes. He studies his adversaries and thus knew his enemies before engaging them. Above everything else his tactics made him win battles. This guy is the Einstein of military warfare. If Sun Tzu was the writer of the War Bible then Hannibal Barca is Jesus Christ. He was capable of annihilating entire armies. If the system in Carthage was comprised similar to the Roman Empire then nothing would be able to stop Hannibal Barca. The only thing that stopped Hannibal was the lack of support he had from Carthage. One has just to look into one of his battles and everyone will agree that he should be on top of this list.

···································································

漢尼拔是這樣一個杰出的領導人,甚至在他死了之后,羅馬是害怕迦太基上升回到突出。實際上,羅馬不僅覺得需要入侵,打敗他們,燃燒他們的城市,它的地面上,我的意思是實際拆除所有建筑物——但他們甚至那么咸地球它是建立在這樣可以建造任何東西。誠然,成吉思汗很好,建立了一個偉大的帝國,但那是由于蒙古人自己的戰斗風格,敵人無法承受打擊和運行與后彎的弓馬弓箭手. .這是有點像征服者的槍干掉阿茲特克人只使用石頭骨+ +++磨木制武器與疾病和槍和馬被Europeans.This傳入美洲,上面的那個家伙在山與大象游行,在得到他的工程師們建造筏帶他們和他的軍隊包括大象…更多

Hannibal was such a brilliant leader that even after he died, Rome was scared of Carthage rising back to prominence. To the point that Rome actually felt the need to not only invade, beat them, burn their city, tear it to the ground literally - by which I mean actually dismantle all buildings - but they then even salted the earth it was built upon so that nothing could be built there again. Admittedly, Genghis Khan was good, built a great empire, BUT that was due to the fighting style of the mongols themselves, their enemies couldn't withstand the hit and run horse bowmen with recurved bows...it was kind of like the Conquistadors with their guns taking out the Aztecs (who only used stone/ bone/ sharpened wooden weapons) with disease and guns and horses (which were introduced to the Americas by Europeans).This, on top of the fact that the guy marched over mountains with elephants, after getting his engineers to build rafts to take them and his army (including the elephants) ... more

···································································

漢尼拔Barka將永遠被銘記的人帶來了羅馬。這樣的壯舉很少被重復,甚至和我的很多朋友從來沒有聽說過迦太基如果不是他。每一次戰斗,羅馬人有優勢,數字,地形,你名字,羅馬人。但是有一件事他們沒有漢尼拔,他被擊敗了,這是真的。但正如我所說,羅馬仍然有優勢。將軍打了他沒有擊敗他純粹的軍事技能的漢尼拔。

Hannibal Barka will forever be remembered as the man who brought Rome to its knees. Such a feat has seldom been repeated, and many of my friends would never have even heard of Carthage were it not for him. Every battle he fought, the Romans had every advantage, numbers, terrain, you name it, the Romans had it. But the one thing they didn't have was Hannibal. He was, defeated, it's true. But as I said, Rome still had every advantage. The general who beat him did not beat him purely out of military skill the way Hannibal did.

···································································

記住,羅馬從未放棄…Cartchage defit和他們surrended.And記得第一次迦太基戰爭…迦太基supirior海軍warsshipAnd他們失去了…你說一些之前請研究

Remember that rome never surrended...Cartchage one defit and they surrended.And remember the first punic war... Carthage had supirior naval warsshipAnd they lost... Please study before you say somthing

Rome had not advandeged

···································································

我friendsCarthage之前已經知道漢尼拔,奧斯陸更強大的羅馬

My friendsCarthage was already known before Hannibal and was olso more powerful of Rome

···································································

漢尼拔將軍擊敗羅馬人與他們優越的數字和技術不是一次兩次,但三大戰役第二次布匿戰爭期間,他的能力將他的軍隊在一起作為一個戰斗力量的競爭對手甚至成型的斯巴達人,是什么讓他的成就他的單位是一個戰斗力量是他們來自西班牙和迦太基。盡管他最終打敗了羅馬的值得注意的是,羅馬,打敗他的兒子第一個羅馬的失敗后,他打敗了。他的父親西皮奧非洲花了剩下的戰爭研究和學習漢尼拔的策略。漢尼拔可能沒有擴大了迦太基帝國像亞歷山大大帝一樣馬其頓的屁股他的軍事思想在戰場上步槍在歷史上。

General Hannibal defeated the Romans with their Superior numbers and Technology not once not twice but three major battles during the Second Punic War. His ability to integrate his troops together as one fighting force Rivals that of even the Spartans. What makes his accomplishments of molding his unit to be one fighting force is the fact that they came from all over Spain and Carthage. Even though his eventual defeat came at the hands of a Roman it is worth noting that the Roman that beat him was the son of the first Roman he defeated. After the defeat of his father Scipio Africanus spent the rest of the war studying and learning Hannibal's tactics. Hannibal may not have expanded the Empire of Carthage the way Alexander the Great did Macedonia butt his military mind on the field of battle is on rifle throughout history.

···································································

漢尼拔在3。接著你可以辯論漢尼拔在凱撒但沒有其他人。他殺了30 40000 trebia河。這就是毀滅這個詞來源。然后他殺死15 20 k aat湖tresamine。如果你看看ticinus河之戰,3戰,一個接一個發生,你有這些3學習策略。反擊,雙包絡,伏擊。他殺死比你像美國人在越南,10到1。什么對我來說有趣的是,殺死比如,歷史學家可以稱之為拙劣的運動。我知道它是一個主鍵征服一個民族一旦入侵。殺死比高id求同存異。

I got hannibal at 3.. Come on.. you can maybe debate hannibal over caesar but no one else.. He killed 30 out of 40,000 at the trebia river.. That's where the word annihilation comes from. Then he kills 15 out of 20k aat lake tresamine. If you look at the battle of the ticinus river, in 3 battles, that occured one after another, you have these 3 tactics to learn. The counter attack, the double envelopment, and the ambush. His kill ratio was somethin like the Americans had in Vietnam,10 to 1. Whats funny to me is that with a kill ratio such as that, that historians can call it a botched campaign.. I understand that its is a primary key to all out conquer a peoples once you invade. With a kill ratio that high id agree to disagree..