拿破侖波拿巴歐美歷屆十大軍事將領在歐美歷屆十大軍事將領中排名第6名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

讓我們來比較一下亞歷山大大帝或成吉思汗拿破侖。亞歷山大大帝比大多數他的敵人,他最好的軍隊。是的,亞歷克斯很好,我會得到我為什么喜歡拿破侖。汗的情況下,沒有人準備好了。歐洲忙于相互戰爭和其他人沒有準備與汗的暴行。在拿破侖的情況下,他驚喜的元素后,他宣稱自己并且。他們知道之后會發生什么,和每個人都反對拿破侖。甚至整個歐洲對他,他還是贏了。不是狡猾地,但是方式。他唯一的錯誤是入侵俄羅斯像希特勒一樣。幸存的不到十年在他的鐵拳的歐洲,一個人除了拿破侖不能獨自做我覺得應該給他

Let's compare Alexander the Great or Ghengis Khan to Napoleon. Alexander the Great outnumbered most of his enemies, and he had better troops. Yes, Alex was very good, and I'll get to why I favored Napoleon. In Khan's situation, no one was ready. Europe was busy at war with each other and everyone else wasn't prepared with the Khan's brutality. In Napoleon's case, he had the element of suprise after he declared himself l'empereur. They knew what to expect afterwards, and EVERYONE was against Napoleon. Even with entire Europe against him, he still won. Not slimly, but but by a ways. His only mistake was invading Russia as Hitler did. Surviving a little less than decade with all of Europe in his iron fist that one man (except Napoleon) could not do alone I think should give him the #1 spot. This says he wasn't just the best tactician to ever live, but also an astute leader like Julius Caesar.

···································································

拿破侖經常戰斗寡不敵眾,整個文明大陸反對他。他發明了許多新軍事戰略甚至公制,所有這一切使他的勝利。他的缺陷,他不希望俄羅斯燒毀自己的資本來阻止他,然而他們所做的。

Napoleon often fought outnumbered, and had an entire civilized continent against him. He invented many new military strategies and even the Metric System, all of which led him to victory. His flaw was that he didn't expect the Russians to burn down their own capital to stop him, yet they did.

···································································

讓我們誠實的面對自己,亞歷山大大帝征服整個歐洲即使與歐洲其他國家。不。即使是凱撒可以勝任這個角色。現在我表達我的敬意,他們是由于,別誤會我;亞歷克斯和凱撒都是偉大的,但拿破侖是一個全新的水平。

Let's be honest with ourselves. Did Alexander the Great conquer all of Europe even when battling literally the rest of Europe. No. Not even Caesar could pull that off. Now I pay my respects where they are due, and don't get me wrong; Alex and Caesar are great and all, but Napoleon is on a whole new level.

···································································

首先至少把他的名字拼對。他是一個莊嚴的圖的神奇魅力和軍事天才使他勝利勝利后在歐洲大陸,并在埃及。他是亞歷山大大帝的時間,現代凱撒,也沒有能反對他。他偉大的缺陷,最終導致了他的失敗是他相信自己的無敵,這源于先前的軍事勝利,他won.Napoleon無疑比壞更有利于世界。許多人都說他是個暴君和軍事獨裁者,在某些方面他。不過他是法國大革命的化身。他建立一個帝國,但同時他是傳播的理想自由,平等,和兄弟情誼,培育出了法國大革命,他釋放了被奴役人民在克羅地亞和波蘭,波蘭的國歌中提到他的名字,寫了一個法律的代碼仍然與法國這一天,而且是…更多

First of all at least spell his first name right... He was a godlike figure whose amazing charisma and military genius brought him victory after victory on the European continent, and in Egypt. He was the Alexander the Great of his time, the modern Caesar, and none could stand against him. His great flaw that ultimately led to his defeat was his belief in his own invincibility, that grew out of previous military victories that he had won.Napoleon has certainly done much more good for the world than bad. Many people label him a tyrant and military dictator, and in some ways he was. However he was the embodiment of the French Revolution. He was building an empire, but at the same time he was spreading the ideals of liberty, equality, and brotherhood, bred out of the French Revolution. He freed enslaved peoples in Croatia and Poland (so much that his name is mentioned in the Polish national anthem) and wrote a law code that remains with France to this day, and is the base for ... more

···································································

這個人是最偉大的,手下來。他一直比他在戰斗和許多仍然拆除他的敵人在奧斯特利茨戰役。他在60總過戰場,只有失去了八。只有八。和他只輸了2決定性戰役。雖然他可能沒有征服了有史以來最土地或建最強大的帝國,他100?0最好的軍隊。許多將軍甚至可能有一個或2奇跡擊敗他們的對手當他們超過如果他們幸運的話。它是拿破侖一樣不斷地挑選一塊干草的干草堆棧只有一個針。他。它了,他非常自信,他故意讓自己在入侵的一個主要城市。數量,仍贏。萊比錫和滑鐵盧奇跡第六第七聯盟。地獄,他連續贏得了五次戰爭. .反對一些國家聯合起來。毫無疑問,他是最好的將軍…更多

This man was simply the greatest of all time, hands down. He was constantly outnumbered in his battles and many he still demolished his foe in (like the Battle of Austerlitz). He fought in 60 total battles, and only lost eight of them. Only eight. And he only lost 2 Decisive battles. Although he may not have conquered the most land ever or built the strongest empire ever, he was 100% the best on the military. Many generals may have one or even 2 miracles where they defeat their foe while they were outnumber (if they were lucky). Napoleon did it as constantly as picking a piece of hay out of a hay stack with only one needle. Over and over he did it. It got to the point where he was so confident that he purposely make himself outnumbered in invading a major city... and still win. Leipzig and Waterloo were miracles for the Sixth and Seventh Coalition. Hell, he won five wars... in a row against a bunch of nations banded together. There is no doubting that he is the best general that has ... more

···································································

我很驚訝Arthur Wellesley并不在這個名單上。而我相信歷史上有幾個將軍韋爾斯利被人能夠擊敗拿破侖給許多嘗試和合適的條件下,我不認為還有一個誰能反對他的純粹的可能。他把每一個歐洲國王自己的膝蓋,他們都只是在一個巨大的拳頭。+ + u2018babies u2018人們說他是一個暴君,但他反對國王的想法,害怕歐洲統治者,法國是第一個現代歐洲共和國和他們必須殺死他的理想。在所有的年齡,可能沒有一個人能夠和拿破侖站腳趾到腳,一直打他。

I'm surprised Arthur Wellesley isn't on this list. While I do believe that there are a few Generals in history (Wellesley being one) who could defeat Napoleon given many tries and the right conditions, I cannot think that there is even one out there who could stand against his sheer might. He brought every King in Europe to their knees, they were all just "babies in the fists of a giant." People say he was a tyrant, but he fought against the idea of a King, and this scared European rulers, for France was the first modern European republic and they had to kill him for his ideals. In all the ages, there isn't likely to be a man who will be able to stand toe to toe with Napoleon and beat him consistently.

Napoleon's remarkable personality was one key to his influence. Above all he inspired his men, for he inspired confidence from privates to field marshals. His opponents learned from Napoleon's innovations. Napoleon was responsible for spreading the values of the French Revolution to other countries, especially in legal reform and the abolition of serfdom. Napoleon was imprisoned Saint Helena in exile by the British, a tropical island of volcanic origin in the South Atlantic Ocean and One of the most isolated islands in the world.

···································································

我在5。到底有誰找到成吉思汗的選票這個東西?成吉思汗是5,因為他可以看出發達還是絲毫不懂加略山的最高水平。直到納粹閃電戰將一支蒙古人一樣那么快。成吉思汗愿意采取一切必要措施實現勝利。費恩撤退,是騎士精神的完美的策略。我相信他會一直停在FranceGermany,或意大利軍隊的神圣羅馬帝國皇帝,由于無法保護補給線和裝甲。

I got genghis at 5. Who in the hell votes for this stuff? Genghis is 5 because he developed calvary on the highest level it can be seen.. Not until the Nazi blitzkrieg would an army move so fast as the mongols did. Genghis was willing to do what was necessary to achieve victory. The feined retreat, was the perfect strategy in the have of chivalry.. I do believe that he'd have been stopped in FranceGermany, or Italy by the armies of the holy roman emperor, due to the inability to keep supply lines open and armour..

···································································

只是一個泰坦的軍事歷史。他的敵人和他的盟友都敬畏他的勇氣和才華。當然,他失去了戰斗,但一個偉大的將軍不是戰斗他失去了判斷,但他不該贏的戰爭,拿破侖從第一天開始他的軍旅生涯無視odds.Maybe最偉大的戰士。

Simply a titan of military history. His enemies like his allies were all in awe of his boldness and talent. Sure, he lost battles, but a great general is not judged on the battles he lost, but the battles he shouldn't have won. And Napoleon from day one of his military career defied the odds.Maybe the greatest soldier of all time.

···································································

人們叫拿破侖一個暴君,但是如果你知道你的歷史很明顯他反對聯盟的戰爭主要是防御戰爭。歐洲君主國并沒有善待的思想自由和精英,這就是為什么奧地利、俄羅斯,其余資金由英國,繼續攻擊法國直到拿破侖推翻,把拿破侖和希特勒是不公平的。

People call Napoleon a tyrant but if you know your history it's clear the wars he fought against the coalitions were mostly defensive wars. The European monarchies did not take kindly to the ideas of liberty and meritocracy and that's why Austria, Russia and the rest, bankrolled by Great Britain, continued attacking France until Napoleon was deposed. It is unfair to compare Napoleon to Hitler.