羅伯特李歐美歷屆十大軍事將領在歐美歷屆十大軍事將領中排名第10名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

李是一個不錯的防御一般,但可憐的進攻。他進攻活動基本上摧毀了軍隊的北弗吉尼亞出血death.How多的敵人軍隊他摧毀了嗎?他著名的勝利是非常被高估了。軍隊錢瑟勒斯維爾戰役后不久,他在葛底斯堡擊敗了阻止他重losses.His偉大的力量擊敗了他面臨的聯盟軍隊,但在擊敗敵人的指揮官,導致他們撤退后刺痛的,但非決定性的打擊。所有的聯盟軍隊他再次擊敗能夠戰斗,很快李defeats.When后面臨著他不能恐嚇格蘭特將軍他被迫戰斗技巧但最終失去運動。在運動造成的失敗與他的早些時候,所不同的是,對方一般沒有嚇倒。一旦發生他軍隊被注定,因為他從來沒有能夠施加決定性的失敗答摧毀…更多

Lee was a decent defensive general, but poor when on offense. His offensive campaigns basically destroyed the Army of Northern Virginia by bleeding it to death.How many enemy armies did he destroy? His famous victories are very overrated. Shortly after Chancellorsville the army he defeated was stopping him at Gettysburg with heavy losses.His great strength was not defeating the Union armies he faced, but in defeating the enemy commander, causing them to retreat after taking a stinging but, non-decisive blow. All the Union armies he defeated were capable of fighting again, very soon after their defeats.When Lee faced a general he could not intimidate (Grant) he was forced to fight a skillful but ultimately losing campaign. In that campaign he inflicted defeats comparable to his earlier ones, the difference was that the opposing general was not intimidated. Once that happened his army was doomed, since he was never able to inflict a decisive defeat tat destroyed ... more

···································································

李是神相比,格蘭特。嚴重超過3比1他應該在前五名,但不是第一。我相信他更值得尊重的原因是因為他的選擇容易贏得與工會但爭取南部和伸出了四年!當他失去了他保持著honorful驕傲。

Lee was a God compared to Grant. Seriously he was outnumbered 3 to 1 he deserves to be in top 5, but not first. The reason I believe he deserves more respect is because he had the choice for the easy win with the union but fought for the south and held out for 4 years! And when he lost he maintained an honorful pride.

···································································

經常忘記李一個事實是,他不是南方部隊的指揮官在內戰。他吩咐一個軍隊,和這一個軍隊的總國防CSA進行。他不允許任何命令在他的國家所使用的全面戰爭策略,和沒有控制資源,部隊動向、和物流,為贏得戰爭。這一事實他的國家資源管理不善,沒有一個有凝聚力的國防合作,并提供長期戰爭,沒有生產資料說明了李和有效的策略是多么重要。而歐盟能夠關注他們的整個戰爭策略在音樂會對韓國,李成為南方后,他贏得了勝利戰勝更大、更好的裝備,訓練有素,和更好的聯邦軍隊。沒有其他指揮官這個列表必須與這些障礙,并沒有其他的指揮官就會看到李的成功如果他們。很容易說,自從邦聯丟失,…更多

One fact that is often forgotten about Lee is that he was not the commander of the confederate forces in the Civil War. He commanded one army, and with that single army conducted the total defense of the CSA. He was not allowed any command over the total war strategy used by his country, and had no control over resources, troop movements, and logistics that go into winning a war. The fact that his country mismanaged resources, did not collaborate in a cohesive defense, and offered not means of production for a prolonged war, illustrates how important and effective Lee's tactics really were. While the union were able to focus their whole war strategy in concert against the south, Lee became the south as he won victory after victory against larger, better equipped, better trained, and better fed troops. No other commander on this list had to fight with such handicaps, and no other commander would have seen Lee's success if they had to. It's easy to say that since the confederacy lost, ... more

···································································

李被高估了,當然不是在同一個類中最大的世界歷史。葛底斯堡是獲勝,并可能在戰爭的幽靈和平民主黨1864年選舉的焦點。但由于錯誤由李和他的下屬飾和山,他的失誤,他是負責他們的勝利,他擊敗了喬治·米德和失去了戰爭和戰爭果斷——唯一的戰爭中他是一個主要的player.Moreover,李的水平和成功的頻率明顯下降,立即“石墻”杰克遜的死亡。而顯然有其他因素在起作用,我認為這是合理的給杰克遜健康的信貸份額李的早期成功,或者錯李教練對他的能力較小的執行官員充分保持成功。

Lee is overrated, and certainly isn't in the same class as the greatest of world history. Gettysburg was winnable, and likely the war with it due to the spectre of the peace democrats looming over the 1864 election. But due to mistakes by Lee and by his subordinates like Ewell and Hill, whose blunders he is as much responsible for as their triumphs, he was outmaneuvered by George Meade and lost both the battle and war decisively- the only war in which he was ever a major player.Moreover, Lee's level and frequency of success declined markedly and immediately upon the death of Stonewall Jackson. While there were obviously other factors in play, I believe it's reasonable to give Jackson a healthy share of the credit for Lee's early success, or alternatively to fault Lee for his inability to coach up lesser officers to execute adequately to maintain that success.

···································································

李人手不足和沒有資源來補充需要的武器和彈藥,以及士兵。然而,他的策略和勇氣幫助韓國贏得神奇victories.Gettysburg應該是令人震驚的勝利南然而,尤厄爾在戰爭中受傷前,失去了他的神經,退回到鎮上他的部隊之后,朝鮮highground。他呆在外面,事情會變得強大interesting.Lee絕對是一位偉大的將軍。甚至爭取一個原因,他不相信。他榮譽回家,和家人。

Lee was undermanned and without resources to replenish needed arms and ammunition, as well as soldiers, in the field. However, his strategy and courage helped the south win amazing victories.Gettysburg should have been an astounding win for the south however, Ewell who had been injured earlier in the war, lost his nerve and retreated back into the town after his troops had run the North off the highground. Had he stayed put, things would have becoming mighty interesting.Lee is definitely one of the great generals of all time. Even fighting for a cause that he didn't believe in. He did honor home, and family.

I defy anyone to point out a military leader who had been provided more underwhelming materials and supplies and was as successful as Lee. I am a Californian, born to a New York couple. So this isn't shrouded in southern pride. He was simply better. But not able to overcome the shortcomings and short supply of his forces. And, 'yes,' Stonewall Jackson was an incredibly adept general and was a serious loss to Lee. Perhaps even a better general than Lee (debatable). But Lee has to go down as one of the all time greatest generals in history.

···································································

戰爭歷史的教授,畢業于西點軍校我不相信有人會寫點東西,所以逃避的事實與我交談過的許多學生和專業人士在這個領域以及偉大leaders.我父親很新的艾森豪威爾都同意羅伯特E李策略是優秀的聲音大部分唯一能說的是他不是很好但是我能找到的唯一原因,有人會說這樣的事情可能是,因為問題的時候必須看事實和事實本身,而不考慮人的感受但是無情這聽起來它必須記住心臟無關我們感知和解釋,有時云是觀點的事實。中尉Col.R。羅賓遜jr。

As a professor of War history and a graduate of West Point I can't believe someone would write something so evasive of facts I have spoken with many students and professionals in this field as well as great leaders. my father new Eisenhower very well all agreed Robert E Lee strategy was excellent sound for the most part the only thing that can be said is he was not good with men. the only reason I can find that one would say such things is perhaps because of the issues of the time one must look at facts and facts alone and not consider one's feelings however heartless this may sound it must be kept in mind that heart has nothing to do with it is our perception and interpretation that sometimes clouds are views from the facts. Lt. Col.R. Robinson jr.

···································································

他一手背后所有的聯盟成功和失敗的戰爭是一個軍隊的指揮官保護一個分崩離析的國家沒有供應或制造,受到了一個幾乎完全防御戰爭時,他命令所有入侵北部的土壤被北維吉尼亞州的軍隊只有少數沒有他盡管在灰色的石墻杰克遜和其他偉大的男孩nathen福勒斯特貝德福德邦聯可能已經持續了5個月更別說5年

He was single handedly behind all of the confederacys success and failure for most of the war being the commander of one army protecting a falling apart country with no supplies or manufacturing that was subjected to a nearly completely defensive war when he commanded all invasions of northern soil being only a few by the army of north Virginia without him despite the other great boys in gray like stonewall Jackson and nathen Forrest Bedford the confederacy may have lasted 5 months let alone 5 years

···································································

+ u2018We知道上帝是誰…但這是李將軍。+ u2018他舉行了軍隊在一起了四年之久,應該迅速湮滅。美國三個和一年半才擊敗日本和德國,但李的光著腳的士兵舉行半年了。李完成不僅通過他的天才,也因為他的神一般的質量。他的人對他有信心的是值得勝利的一半。

"We know who God is... but here is General Lee." He held an army together for four long years that should have been annihilated quickly. It took America three and one half years to defeat the Japanese and Germans but Lee's barefooted soldiers held on for half a year longer. Lee accomplished much not only through his genius but also because of his god-like gualities. His men had confidence in him which was worth half the victory.

···································································

極其聰明,經驗豐富,忠于職守,忠誠,有紀律的,有禮貌的人。對我有偏見,我是維吉尼亞州的生活在列克星敦附近,他埋葬,但他的軍事力量是如此之大,工會拼命試圖讓他整個聯盟的將軍軍事陸軍和海軍!他拒絕當我和維吉尼亞州脫離聯邦的家中有一個極端的對這個人的尊重。

An extremely brilliant, skilled, dedicated, loyal, disciplined and polite man. Call me biased as I am a Virginian that lives near Lexington where he is buried but his military prowess was so great that the Union desperately tried to make him the General of the entire UNION MILITARY ARMY AND NAVY! He declined when his home state of Virginia seceded and I have an extreme respect for this man.