
·······································································
···································································
曼施坦因無疑是最好的二戰期間一般。+ u2018What艾森豪威爾呢?+ u2018你說,看看如何組織和殘骸諾曼底登陸。曼施坦因,另一方面,是德國占領法國的原因,只要他們在東線。他失敗的原因是,希特勒沒有給他足夠的權威,他應該已經得到。他也很勇敢,他經常說希特勒提出一個愚蠢的想法,最不能的東西。這種政治方面也讓他很有影響力的人在二戰期間。
Manstein was easily the best general during World War II. "What about Eisenhower?" You say, just look at how unorganized and a wreck D-Day was. Manstein, on the other hand, is the reason Germany conquered France and held out as long as they did on the Eastern front. The reason why he failed is that Hitler didn't give him enough authority as he should've been given. He is very brave too, as he regularly spoke out when Hitler suggested a stupid idea, something that most couldn't. This political aspect also made him a very influential person during WWII.
···································································
很棒的家伙,他真的可能有德國贏得二戰如果沒有希特勒,我甚至不知道他為什么在名單上,人們喜歡馮Moltke值得在這里超過他。他不是一個白癡和其他德國員工,知道坦克和飛機是未來,基本上是在東方隆美爾的同行,這是像隆美爾的人最需要的地方。盡管我同意這個家伙應該是前十,我仍然認為馮Moltke te的名單上。他是他那個時代提前40年,建立了第一個總參謀部,坦克和理解物流、甚至徹底打敗奧地利和法國與劣質設備。他“不小心”只處理派遣了大約30000多名軍隊130000年法國軍隊,他們仍然設法贏得壓倒性的勝利。
Awesome guy, he literally could have had Germany win WWII if not for Hitler (which I don't even know why he's on the list, people like Von Moltke deserve to be here more than him). He wasn't an idiot like other German staff, knew tanks and airplanes were the future, and was basically Rommel's counterpart in the East, and that was where people like Rommel were most needed. Although I agree this guy should be top 10, I still argue for Von Moltke te Elder to be on the list. He was 40 years ahead of his generation, established the first General Staff, understood tanks and logistics, and steamrolled the Austrians and the French even with inferior equipment. He 'accidently' only sent about 30,000 troops to deal with a 130,000 French army, and they STILL managed to win a crushing victory.
···································································
純粹的軍事天才,他可以贏得了第二次世界大戰的納粹德國,他得到的自由行動,他問希特勒很多次。他的想法槽攻擊阿登導致幾乎完全戰勝法國和她的盟友東部。1940年,他開始區分自己征服了當時世界上最堅固的港口塞瓦斯托波爾在一場血腥的戰斗。他救了南部的德國東部戰線進行熟練的撤退1942 - 43,冬天只是為了阻止蘇聯進攻,它被稱為第三星期幾哈爾科夫戰役,他的失敗主要是由于在庫爾斯克集團軍群中心無力施加足夠的壓力在蘇聯北部隆起,雖然他幾乎達到一個突破到敵人的后方,被僵硬的蘇聯停止抵抗和希特勒的決定暫停操作+ u2018Citadel + u2018。他在1943 - 44顯示良好的技能造成巨大的蘇聯…更多
A pure military genius, he could have won the Second World War for the Nazi Germany had he been given the freedom of actions that he asked Hitler so many times. His idea for an attack trough Ardennes has led to an almost complete victory over France and her allies in 1940. In East he starting distinguishing himself by conquering the most fortified port in the world at that time (Sevastopol) in a bloody fight. Then he saved the Southern part of the German Eastern front by conducting a masterful retreat in the winter of 1942-43, only for stopping the Soviet offensive in whan it is called the Third Battle of Kharkov. His defeat at Kursk was mostly caused by the inability of Army Group Center to put enough pressure on the Northern part of the Soviet bulge, although he was nearly to achieve a breakthrough into the enemy's rear, being stopped by the stiff Soviet resistance and Hitler's decision to halt the operation "Citadel". In 1943-44 he showed good skills by inflicting huge Soviet ... more
···································································
可能在二戰中最大的戰略天才。他能夠對抗許多成功的防守戰斗反對大規模優越的敵人。如果希特勒允許他在東線的行動自由,我們可能有一個完全不同的結果,至少它會采取蘇聯更長的時間來進軍Germany.Compared他茹科夫是一個笑話,只贏得一場戰斗超過德國的賠率。
Probably the greatest strategic genius in WWII. He was able to fight many successful defensive battles against a massively superior enemy. If Hitler had allowed him freedom of action on the Eastern front, we may have had an entirely different outcome, At the very least it would have taken the Soviets far longer to push into Germany.Compared to him Zhukov was a joke, who only ever won a battle by outnumbering the Germans 10-1.
···································································
偉大的將軍,但他需要馮龍德斯泰特Rommal一樣。你可以要求都有最好的指導。
Great general but he needed Von Rundstedt like Rommal did. Both had the best guidance you could ask for.
···································································
他不僅是最杰出的戰略家我們所有的將軍,但他有一個很好的政治意義。一個人的質量長期希特勒太難以下咽。在會議上曼施坦因常常不同于希特勒,在別人面前,至于宣布提出的一些想法,希特勒是無稽之談。
He was not only the most brilliant strategist of all our generals, but he had a good political sense. A man of that quality was too difficult for Hitler to swallow for long. At conferences Manstein often differed from Hitler, in front of others, and would go so far as to declare that some of the ideas which Hitler put forward were nonsense.
···································································
曼施坦因是一位才華橫溢的戰略思想家取勝的許多戰斗有時days.In歐洲他擊敗了許多國家快,為什么他這么看著他的將軍和Hitler.We今天也看看他的啊,只是他從未擊敗任何重大權力和最終被解雇不能。處理東線的關鍵戰役
Manstein was a brilliant strategic thinker wining many battles in some times days.In Europe he defeated many countries fast that's why he's so looked upon by his fellow Generals and Hitler.We also look at his aw today but simply he never defeated any major power and was eventually sacked unable. To deal with crucial battles of the eastern front
···································································
出色的防守過戰場對紅軍的長期戰爭的至少一個額外year.After二戰美國幫助他從監獄里被釋放的設計計劃對蘇聯的防御行動union.Zhukov承認·馮·曼施坦因是他最大的對手。
Fought outstanding defensive battles against the red army which prolonged the war for at least an extra year.After world war 2 he was released from prison by the US to help devise plans for defensive operations against the soviet union.Zhukov admitted that Von Manstein was his greatest opponent.
···································································
想出了一個計劃與3的力量打敗敵人,百萬,160000,用很少的損失,在歷史上沒有一個人可以宣稱已經做了,希特勒應該站起來,對他的懷疑城堡,最終加快德國的失敗。
Came up with a plan to defeat an enemy with the strength of 3,million, with 160,000, with very few losses, no one in history, can claim to have done that, should have stood up to Hitler, about his doubts over Citadel, which ultimately quickened Germany;s defeat.
···································································
他無疑是最出色的指揮官不是德國,而是整個戰爭。我不明白為什么隆美爾比他有更多的名譽和聲望。他比隆美爾將軍的10倍。
He is no doubt the most outstanding commander of not Germany but the entire war. I don't get why Rommel had more fame and popularity than him. He's 10 times more of a general than Rommel would ever be.
0 篇文章
如果覺得我的文章對您有用,請隨意打賞。你的支持將鼓勵我繼續創作!