蘇丹l-?āhir smi al-Din Baibars al-Bunduqdari(Scipio Africanus)——歐美歷屆十大軍事將領

蘇丹l-?āhir smi al-Din Baibars al-Bunduqdari(Scipio Africanus)——歐美歷屆十大軍事將領在《歐美歷屆十大軍事將領》中排名第28名。我們精選了部分網友觀點： ...

蘇丹歐美歷屆十大軍事將領在歐美歷屆十大軍事將領中排名第28名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

讓我們不要忘記,漢尼拔只有在他最好的時候他決定戰斗的條件,,,等。此外,漢尼拔的長壽是由于他故意避免戰斗。現在通常當你發號施令,選擇戰斗,基本上櫻桃挑選一個戰爭,那將是令人震驚的是否漢尼拔持續了不到他did.Scipio不僅要做的可能超越最聰明的激戰,實際上他必須打敗他。這兩個與天賦,他昂首闊步,和信心。我看到的不是一個壯舉超越。西皮奧操縱主機械手,拉下褲子,一旦發現與大占了上風。

Let's not forget, Hannibal was only at his best when HE dictated the conditions of the battle--where, when, etc... Furthermore, Hannibal's longevity was due to his intentional avoidance of battle. Now typically when you get to call the shots, pick and choose battles, and essentially cherry pick a war, it would be shocking if Hannibal lasted any less than he did.Scipio not only had to do the impossible of outsmarting the smartest into a pitched battle, he had to actually defeat him. Both of which he did with flair, swagger, and confidence. A feat I see as of yet not surpassed. Scipio manipulated the master manipulator, and once caught with his pants down, the greater general prevailed.

···································································

如何你不把非洲西皮奧在最好的將軍。他defited古代歷史上最好的將軍。他總羅馬軍隊改革策略…短劍…隊列…。你可以研究ilipa 206因為. .的我希望你把非洲西皮奧唯一最好的…他打賭漢尼拔巴薩古代歷史最偉大的將軍。這是我的第二個請求,你把西皮奧amoghest最好的將軍和你沒有. .你怎么你把skanderberg和Scipip甚至沒有提到. .你. .我的電子郵件是如何giusepperaimondo@ hotmail.com . .我等待響應. .最好把朱塞佩

How there you don' t put scipio Africanus among best general... He defited the best general in ancient history... He made a total Roman army reform... Tactics... The gladius... Cohort... Maneuver.. And you can study ilipa 206 because... At ones I want you put Scipio Africanus the one and only greates general of all the time... He beted Hannibal barca the greatest general of ancient history... This is my second request that you put scipio amoghest the best general and you didn't... How there you you put skanderberg and Scipip is not even mention... How there you... My email is giusepperaimondo@ hotmail.com... I ' waiting for a responds... The best regard giuseppe

···································································

漢尼拔是羅馬城外五英里;巨大的政治壓力存在西皮奧漢尼拔在意大利作戰。相反,西皮奧了軍事和政治天才,去非洲攻擊迦太基,導致漢尼拔離開意大利。聰明。西皮奧打敗漢尼拔,羅馬的卓越。他是僅次于亞歷山大。

Hannibal was five miles outside the city of Rome; intense political pressure existed for Scipio to fight Hannibal in Italy. Instead, Scipio demonstrated military and political genius, going to Africa to attack Carthage, causing Hannibal to leave Italy. Brilliant. Scipio beat Hannibal, launching Rome's preeminence. He's second only to Alexander.

···································································

軍事歷史的學生我很震驚美國上市的非洲如此之低,他贏得了第二次布匿戰爭。他積極超過17年,從未打過敗仗。他擊敗了漢尼拔在扎馬而略比。他是一個政治家。許多你在他面前有微小的貢獻的比較列表。他必須高于漢尼拔。

As a student of military history I was appalled to find S. Africanus listed so low. He won the Second Punic War. He was active for more than 17 years and NEVER lost a battle. He defeated Hannibal at Zama while slightly outnumbered. He was a statesman as well. Many of those you have before him in the list have contributions that are miniscule by comparison. He has to be higher than Hannibal.

···································································

布拉沃親愛的朋友. .知道歷史的人

Bravo my dear friends... Someone that knows about history

···································································

51歲,真的嗎?他可能是最好的軍事指揮官。他不只是打敗漢尼拔,可以說是歷史上第二個最好的將軍。他打敗了一切,每個人都對他發送。西班牙征服者,和歷史上為數不多的不敗將軍。

51, really? He is probably the best military commander of all time. He didn't JUST defeat Hannibal, who is arguably the 2nd best general in History. He defeated EVERYTHING and EVERYONE sent against him. Conqueror of Spain, and one of the few undefeated generals in history.

···································································

不僅是西皮奧不敗在戰斗中,他實現了他的勝利,他是一個偉大的戰略家。在西班牙,他設法克服3迦太基軍隊都超過他。和在非洲在大平原和扎馬偏離標準羅馬三行顯示他的戰術。

Not only was Scipio undefeated in battle, it was the way in which he achieved he's victories that makes him a great strategist. In Hispania he managed to overcome 3 Carthaginian armies that all outnumbered him. And in Africa at the Battle of the Great Plains and Zama his deviation from the standard Roman triple line showed his tactical Nouse.

···································································

可能他沒有贏得漢尼拔羅馬從來沒有存在過,沒有歐洲的羅馬文化,正如我們所知,沒有歐洲從未出生,這個世界將會完全different.Without他的皮拉爾斯通這世界文化將迦太基。

Might he have not win Hannibal Rome would have never existed, without the roman culture Europe, as we know it, would have never been born, without Europe this world would be totally different.Without him our pilar stone of this world culture would be Carthage.

···································································

他不應高于漢尼拔因為他剛剛發現如何使用羅馬的大軍隊和供應自己的優勢。羅馬/ 2年才找到人不是愚蠢的匹配與漢尼拔的一半。

He should not be higher than Hannibal because he just figured out how to use Rome's greater army and supplies to his own advantage. It took Rome over 2 decades to find someone who wasn't half stupid to match against Hannibal.

Scipio Africanus if not considered better than his greatest adversary, should at least be ranked near him. To defeat the mighty Hannibal Barca is no easy feat. Additionally this man does not lose!