反槍支法(Anti guns laws)——歐美十大禁忌

反槍支法(Anti guns laws)——歐美十大禁忌在《歐美十大禁忌》中排名第23名。我們精選了部分網友觀點： ...

反槍支法歐美十大禁忌在歐美十大禁忌中排名第23名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

你不能通過取走槍支來使守法的公民更安全。這已經被反復證明了。在世界上任何一個嚴格控制槍支的地方，暴力犯罪率都在上升，無一例外。然而，人們仍然認為通過取締槍支可以使世界更加安全。對于通常以智力優勢為標志的左派對槍支缺乏邏輯思考，這讓人大惑不解

You cannot make law abiding citizens safer by taking away their guns. That's been proven over and over again. Everywhere in the world where they have strict gun control the violent crime rate has risen. Everywhere, without exception. And yet people still think they can make the world safer by outlawing guns. The lack of logical thought regarding guns by the left, which usually has intellectual superiority as its hallmark, boggles the mind.

···································································

澳大利亞有嚴格的槍支法律，而且自亞瑟港以來我們還沒有發生過大規模槍擊事件。—弗羅澤哈丁博肯凡

Australia has strict gun laws and we haven't had a mass shooting since Port Arthur. - FrozenHatingPokefan

···································································

不，你們美國人只需要更好的警察，那你就不需要槍了，因為警察會保護你。—LemonComputer

Nah, you Americans just need better police, then you wont need guns because the police would protect you. - LemonComputer

···································································

不，萊蒙。我們需要更少的人依靠警察來保護。警察不總是對你的，a.44馬格南是可以的。槍不能像一個有錯誤想法的警察一樣開槍。這樣怎么樣？

No, Lemon. We need less people relying on police for protection. Cops aren't always right by you, a.44 magnum can be. A gun can't shoot you like a cop with the wrong idea can too. How bout that?

···································································

我是單身女性，住在一棟公寓樓的底層，我需要阿貢來保證安全。有人可能會打破我的窗戶。罪犯總是有槍的，為什么有人想把槍從房主那里拿走。我姑姑今天還活著，因為她有槍，從來沒有人談論過這種事。這種事經常發生

I am a single female, and I live on the bottom floor of an apartment building, and I need agun to be safe. Someone could break in my window. Criminals will always have guns, why would anyone feel like taking them away from homeowners. My aunt is only alive today because she owns a gun, and no one ever talks about that kind of thing. It happens all the time.

···································································

搬到一個獨裁的國家。更安全。—麥克沃格德

Move to an authoritarian country. Safer. - MChkflaguard_Yt

···································································

那些認為不應該有槍的人根本沒有思考。罪犯會以某種方式得到槍，就像他們如何得到毒品一樣。它所能做的就是解除守法公民的武裝，讓他們變得脆弱。讓我們面對現實吧，我覺得在我家里有槍會安全得多——瑞安里梅爾

People who think there should be no guns aren't thinking at all. Criminals will get their hands on guns one way or another, just like how they get their hands on drugs. All it will do is disarm the law abiding citizen and make them vulnerable. Let's face it, id feel much much safer with a gun in my house - ryanrimmel

···································································

為什么我們要讓他們更容易得到一個呢？我認為唯一應該改變的是檢查數量，以確保你可以合法擁有一把槍。如果一個有憤怒問題的人隨身攜帶一把隱藏的武器怎么辦？我不管我有多少不喜歡的東西，槍純粹是用來殺人的。如果你覺得把槍放在家里更安全，好吧，我尊重這一點。但在公共場合帶著一個是危險和可怕的。對我來說不是這樣，但我8歲的弟弟害怕我們在停車場，他看到有人拿著手槍，他真的很害怕這是不對的。-Katekat123

Why should we make it easier for them to get one? I think the only thing that should be changed are the amount of checks to be sure that you can legally own a gun. What if someone with anger issues got to carry around a concealed weapon? I don't care how many dislikes I get, guns are made for the pure purpose of killing. If you feel safer by keeping a gun in your house, okay I respect that. But carrying around one in public is dangerous and frightening. (not for me but my 8 year old brother was scared we were in a parking lot and he saw someone with a handgun and was really scared that isn't right.) - Katekat123

···································································

自1993年以來，93%用于犯罪的槍支是通過非法手段獲得的

Since 1993 93 percent of guns used in crimes were gained through illeagle means - boltslegend

···································································

這完全是在與修正案相抵觸。準確地說，是第二修正案。我不知道哪個白癡會公開反對修正案。如果你愿意的話，估計會引起軒然大波。-不錯

This is quite literally contradicting an amendment. The second amendment, to be precise. And I don't know which idiot is REALLY going to openly oppose an amendment. And if you will, then expect an uproar. - FineDough