福爾摩斯(Sherlock Holmes)——歐美最佳圖書人物

福爾摩斯(Sherlock Holmes)——歐美最佳圖書人物在《歐美最佳圖書人物》中排名第40名。我們精選了部分網友觀點： ...

福爾摩斯歐美最佳圖書人物在歐美最佳圖書人物中排名第40名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

在這篇評論中，排名前十位的人物完全是那些可怕的、夸大其詞的亂七八糟的人物，我甚至都不會稱之為連貫的。顯然，沒有人知道什么是偉大的、優秀的，甚至是可以通過的文學作品

The top ten, as of this comment, consists entirely of characters from horrible, overblown messes that I would barely even call coherent. Clearly, nobody knows anything about great (or good, or even passable) literature.

···································································

你說得對。不管怎樣，這個網站上只有孩子嗎？-盧卡斯馬蒂尼

You're right. By any case are there only kids in this site? - lucasmartini

···································································

就我個人而言，我相信福爾摩斯是一個只有上流知識分子才能理解的人物，而投票給他的人并不多，這讓我推斷每個人都是一個沒受過教育的黃鼠狼

Personally I believe Sherlock Holmes is a character that only classy intellectuals could possibly comprehend and the fact that not many people voted him makes me deduce that everyone is an uneducated weasel.

···································································

唯一一個定義了習性的角色。沒有人能接近。你說你想要“分層”的角色。一個有怪癖的可信的人怎么樣？不是每個人都需要讓他們的家人被槍殺

The one character who has defined mannerisms. Nobody else comes even close. You say you want "layered" characters. How about a believable person that has their quirks? Not everyone needs to have had their family shot dead.

···································································

史上最有名的偵探

Most famous detective of all time

···································································

是的，我愛福爾摩斯

Hell yes I love sherlock holmes

···································································

他一定在前五名

He must be in top 5

···································································

他是最棒的！不管你喜不喜歡。：-夏洛克絕對應該是“頭號人物”

He is THE BEST! Whether you like it or not.:-)Sherlock should definitely be 'numero uno'