美國人以驚人的速度互相射擊歐美人們認為美國人愚蠢的十大原因在歐美人們認為美國人愚蠢的十大原因中排名第9名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

擁有武器的意義何在，為了自衛？！？！槍是用來殺戮和摧毀一個家庭的。恐怖分子殺人是完全錯誤的，但是開槍是因為你在自衛。沒有槍的國家犯罪和殺人要少得多。我知道在美國有危險的人，他們大多是窮人，因為他們得不到錢因為他們的父母沒有好好照顧他們的父母，或者他們的父母不關心他們的工作

What's the point of owning a weapon, to defend yourself?!?! Guns are used for killing and destroy a family. Terrorists killing people is completely wrong but shooting someone because your defending yourself. Countries without guns have way less crimes and killing being done. I know that there are dangerous people in the USA and their mostly poor people who are in need of money because they can't get a good job because the completely failed school because they didn't care, their parents didn't care or the parents just don't have enough money because they or their parents didn't care

···································································

如果你不繼續修改你的憲法，而將破爛的耳環怪物扔進垃圾桶，那么你將不再有超過50%的國家高喊他們有“攜帶武器的權利”，而事實上，這是300多年前的事了，把全國步槍協會帶到愛爾蘭去，在那里他們可以隨心所欲地美化槍支，并時不時地與愛爾蘭共和軍（IRA）進行一次交火，以保持每個人的目標都處于良好的狀態。在美國撫養一個孩子，知道他或她有50%的機會在課堂上被槍殺，而這是在學校的頭5年里，哪位家長會感到高興呢，如果他們在前5年沒有被殺，那么在學校的高年級被槍殺的幾率會增加15%，在持槍家庭成員家中被槍殺的幾率也會增加近100%……即使“我不知道他們是怎么找到我的槍的”。是的，你猜到了，我是憑空得出這些百分比的，但很遺憾，他們可能有點接近目標。你會繼續說“改變”。從…開始改變吧

If, instead of continually amending your constitution you would instead bin the rag-earred monster then you would no longer have over 50% of your country shouting they have "the right to bear arms", when in fact, that was so over 300 years ago. Then, see the NRA off to Ireland where they can glorify guns all they want to and have a bit of a shoot-out with the IRA now and again to keep everybody's aim in good nick. What parent can feel good about rearing a child in the US knowing he or she has a 50% chance of being shot in class (and that is during the first 5 years of school), an additional 15% chance of being shot in upper levels of school (if they weren't killed the during first 5 years), and nearly 100% chance of being shot in the home of a gun-owning family member...even if "I don't know how they found my gun". Yes, you guessed it, I'm pulling those percentages out of thin air but sadly, they are probably somewhat close to the mark. You lot go on about "change"...start changing at ... more

···································································

我十四歲的時候買了把槍，但…我不認為這是個好主意。盡管我非常喜歡它，但我不希望擁有槍支的權利被人濫用。見鬼，我希望擁有槍支的權利只用于職業目的，而不是那些只想看起來很酷的平民。看看發生了什么。幾年前，大約有20個孩子我們學校中槍了。另外，以前每個人都取笑我，也取笑學校里的這個孤獨的孩子，因為其他人都有自己的槍。即使我的手指第一次扣動扳機，我仍然認為擁有槍并不是必要的

I got myself a gun when I was fourteen but...I don't think that's a good idea.As much as I really love it, I don't want gun ownership rights to be abused by people. Hell, I wish gun ownership was only used for professional purposes, not for random civilians who just want to look cool.Look what happened. A few years ago, about 20 kids in our school got shot. Plus, everyone used to tease me and also this lone kid back at school because everyone else has a gun of their own.Even if my finger will land itself on the trigger for the first time, I still think gun ownership isn't really necessary.

···································································

我首先想到的是槍支擁有率很高，但我不得不改變這一點，因為真正的問題不是槍支擁有。還有一些國家的武裝程度甚至超過了美國。問題是，除了那些積極參與戰爭、毒品戰爭的國家外，美國人對彼此使用槍支的次數比其他任何國家都多。即便如此這只是問題的一部分。人們互相射擊是愚蠢的。美國人不顧一切理由和理由堅持認為槍支可以保護他們的安全，是上帝賦予他們的權利，這是另一部分

I first had the high rate of gun ownership here, but had to change that because it is not gun ownership that is really the issue. There are other countries that are even more armed than the US. The issue is that Americans use those guns on each other more than any other countries save those actively at war (counting drug wars).And even that is only a part of the problem. People shooting each other is stupid. Americans who insist in defiance of all reason and rationale that guns keep them safe and are a God given right are the other part.

···································································

我對美國有一點不了解，我是加拿大人，雖然我認為我們的國家是世界上最好的榜樣，我已經訪問過美國好幾次了，我很欣賞你和你的幾代人在你之前建造的東西。我的問題是：如果你期望每一個公民都能為個人和國防的目的而武裝，并且這些武器與你的武裝部隊相當，那你為什么還需要你的武裝部隊呢？這不是他們的工作嗎？在我看來，作為一個簡單的加拿大人，NRA在你們的憲法中提到的修正案，是在一個非常真實的威脅，即大英帝國將要“卷土重來”的時候起草的，武裝民兵隨時準備戰斗的必要性是有道理的。300年的時間不分先后，我敢肯定……更多

The one thing I don't understand about America, and I say this with all affection, because I love your country and your people. I am Canadian, and although I think our country is the best model to follow in the world, I have visited America several times and can appreciate what you and the generations before you have built. My question is this: if you expect every single citizen to be armed for the purpose of personal and national defense, and for those arms to be equivilant to those available to your armed forces---why do you need your armed forces at all? Isn't that their job? It seems to me (a simple Canadian) that the amendments to which the NRA refers to in your constitution were written and intended for a time when there was a very real threat that the British Empire was going to "come back". When taken in this context, the need for armed militia's ready to fight at moments notice makes sense. 300 years (give or take) pass, and just speaking for myself here, I'm pretty sure that ... more

···································································

是的，我同意。我不想這么說，但有些美國人有很多機會獲得槍支和火器。憲法制定時，只有步槍和靈長類槍支。這意味著你不能，我不知道，走進同性戀夜總會，射殺50多人！咳嗽對不起，我有點瘋了！哈哈。我的家人反對槍械，希望能有更安全的政策。從我5歲起，他們總是說，如果我在朋友家看到槍，我本來要打電話回家，然后被立即接走的。我們家里沒有玩弄死亡機器的。很遺憾，有些人受的傷太大了，他們會殺了一些人，有時甚至是自己！我簡直不敢相信！

Yeah... I can agree with that. I hate to say it but some Americans have to much access to guns and fire arms. When the constitution was written, there were only riffles and very primative guns around. This meant that you couldn't, I don't know, WALK INTO A GAY NIGHT CLUB AND SHOOT OVER 50 PEOPLE! *Cough* Sorry, I went a little crazy there! Lol. My family is against fire arms and want more secure policies on them. From the time I was 5, they always said that if I ever was at a friends house and saw a gun, I was to call home and get picked up amediatly. We don't kid around with death machines in my family. It's sad that some people are hurt enough that they will kill inocent people and sometimes themselves! I just can't believe it!

···································································

自從他們的憲法第二修正案以來，美國人就不想用槍來控制他們的生活了。他們也不想用槍來控制他們的生活，因為他們不想用槍來控制他們介紹。哦，還有全國步槍協會的宣傳，共和黨人和愚蠢的美國人只是盲目地跟隨。他們有他們的幻想，如果每個人都有槍，那么槍擊案將如何進行：如果一個壞人走進銀行，說“所有人都趴在地上”，那么所有的“好人”都掏出槍說“不，你趴在地上”。這太血腥了可笑。美國人對他們自己的政府如此恐懼，他們覺得擁有Ak-47可以保護他們免受無人機和坦克暴君的襲擊。沒有一件事能阻止另一個桑迪胡克事件發生，看看幾天前發生的奧蘭多槍擊案。全國步槍協會是如此愚蠢，以至于……更多

Americans are so obsessed with their constitution that they worship their second Amendment when shootings occur on a regular basis. They also have the stupidest reasons for not wanting gun control like "Gun's don't kill people. People kill people." Yet when you look at Australia (where I live) we haven't a mass shooting since gun control was introduced. Oh and the NRA's propaganda that Republicans and dumb Americans just follow blindly. They have their fantasies of how if everyone had guns then how shootings would play out: If a bad guy walks into a bank and says "everyone on the ground", then all the "good guys" pull out their guns and say "NO you get on the floor". It's bloody ludicrous. And Americans are so fearful of their own government they feel that by having an Ak-47 will protect them from a tyrant with drones and tanks. Not one thing has been done to prevent another Sandy Hook from occuring and look what happened a few days ago, the Orlando shooting. The NRA is so stupid that ... more

···································································

太對了。任何一場戰斗都會導致暴力，最終有人受傷或死亡。他們中的很多人似乎都在用它來威脅人們得到他們想要的東西。目的是為了確保安全，看到特權被濫用真的很難過。我想政府應該忽視這一點，或者至少在處理槍支的問題上更嚴格一些，讓規定更加嚴格。你不知道他們能用它做什么。整個“生意就是生意”就是廢話。所以你是說為了錢你會讓無辜的旁觀者被殺？Pfft公司

Too true. Any fight can lead to violence and someone ends up getting injured or kill in the process. It seems like a lot of them are using it to threaten people to get what they want. The purpose is to ensure safety and it's really sad to see that priviledge being abused. I think the government should overlook this, or at least be more strict as to make the rules more strict when it comes to handing guns. You don't know what they can do with it. The whole "business is business" is bs. So you're saying that you'd let innocent bystanders get killed for the sake of money? Pfft.

···································································

那么，這把槍是從哪里來的呢？那些只去過美國的人看了新聞，認為出去走都不安全，這聽起來像是一個孩子聽到他爸爸說床下有怪物后會做的事情。我同意美國有問題，但我們每4到8個小時就會收到同一個人的復寫本這些年使改變變得如此困難以至于你開始習慣成為一個不同國家的人所說的墮落者

So where did this gun thing even come from people that have only visited america read the news and think that it's not even safe to walk outside which sounds like something a kid would do after hearing it from his dad that monsters were under the bed I agree america has problems but we keep getting carbon copy's of the same people every 4 to 8 years which makes it hard for change so hard you start to get used to being a what other people from different countries call degenerates

···································································

有些人不知道，我們之所以有槍，是因為約翰·洛克，一個思想對我國自然權利、君主立憲制、人權法案等產生了重大影響的人，是因為如果政府侵犯或試圖撤銷我們的權利，我們可以引用我的歷史老師的話，“干掉政府”。這也是為了保護。然而，好的也有壞的。罪犯經常利用這一權利來傷害人

Some people don't know that the reason why we have guns is that John Locke, a man whose thinking influenced our country greatly (natural rights, constitutional monarchy, bill of rights, etc.), is because if the government ever violated or tried to revoke our rights, we can, quoting from my History teacher, "take out the government." This is also for protection. However, with the good, comes the bad. Criminals often take advantage of this right to harm people.