他們選舉共和黨人(They elect Republicans)——歐美人們認為美國人愚蠢的十大原因

他們選舉共和黨人(They elect Republicans)——歐美人們認為美國人愚蠢的十大原因在《歐美人們認為美國人愚蠢的十大原因》中排名第37名。我們精選了部分網友觀點： ...

他們選舉共和黨人歐美人們認為美國人愚蠢的十大原因在歐美人們認為美國人愚蠢的十大原因中排名第37名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

什么？這其實很好。很好，我們不投票給民主黨人。這就是為什么我們美國人了解我們的國家。民主基本上是一種投票制度，人民投票給一件事，任何一件事得到最多的選票都會付諸行動。哦，讓我不要忘記，民主國家沒有法律。然而，一個共和國是建立在真實的基礎上的法律應該對每個人都公平，然后你會堅持這些法律。為什么民主是不好的，是因為如果人民投票給不好的東西。為什么叫唐納德特朗普的小丑贏得總統選舉迄今為止。因此，我們應該投共和黨的票

WHAT? This is actually Good. It's good we don't vote for democrats. This is why we Americans learn about our country. Democracy is basically a voting system where the people vote for 1 thing and whichever thing gets the most votes gets put into action oh and let me not forget there are no laws in a Democracy. A Republic though, is based on true laws that are supposed to be fair for everybody and then you would stick to those laws. Why Democracy is bad is because what if the people vote for the bad thing. What's why that Clown named Donald Trump is winning the election for president so far. So therefore, we should vote for republicans.

···································································

該黨的綱領否認科學，包括幾乎一致接受的進化論和氣候變化理論，其支持者希望關閉幾乎所有的聯邦政府，包括使我們作為一個社會不至于徹底崩潰的東西——社會保障和老年人醫療保險，環保局阻止毒藥進入我們的空氣、土地和河流，教育部阻止我們變得更蠢，國稅局讓我們永遠不必為這些共產主義項目納稅……誰會支持這樣一個愚蠢的政黨？

The party whose platform denies science, including virtually unanimously accepted theories of evolution and climate change, and whose supporters want to shut down nearly all of the Federal government, including the things that were put in place to keep us from completely collapsing as a society - social security and medicare for our elderly, the EPA to keep poisons from our air, land and rivers, the Dept of Education to keep us from being even stupider, the IRS so we never have to pay taxes to pay for any of these commie programs... who would support a stupid party like that?

···································································

我不反對這個網站上的保守用戶，但我同意這一說法。我是作為一個自由主義者長大的，我很感激我知道我的選擇沒有錯。也許這沒有對錯之分。只是共和黨人需要改變他們的這些東西，從長遠來看對美國不利。—現代流行音樂

I have nothing against conservative users on this website, but I agree with this statement. I was raised as a liberal and I'm thankful that I know my choice isn't wrong. Maybe there is no right or wrong to this. It's just that Republicans need to change these things about them that won't be good for America in the long-term. - ModernSpongeBobSucks

···································································

我們選舉的人是為資產階級服務的，而不是為工人階級服務的。這是由于國家保護私有財產的方式，也是由于資本家控制國家權力的事實

*We elect people who serve the interests of the capitalist class and not the working class. This is due to how the state protects private property and due to the fact that the capitalists control state power. Examine the policies in D.C. - Joey1111

···································································

他們不知道自由主義和自由主義之間的含義。自由主義或新自由主義與可再生能源計劃的關系更密切，因為自由主義的原則被資本化了。自由主義來自拉丁語“自由”，意思是自由。誰反對自由？甚至是民主黨所主張的經濟自由？如果你想進行只對你的國家有利的經濟貿易，購買美國產品，通過提高進口稅使非美國產品變得昂貴，而不是進口一些外國產品等等，事實上，你與法西斯或口耳相傳的思想密切相關

They don't know the meaning between liberal and liberalism. Liberalism or neo-liberalism is closer related to replubican programs because the principles of liberalism are capitalized. Liberal comes from the latin word Liber which means free. Who is against freedom? Or even economic freedom which democrats stand for? If you want economic trades that benefits only your country ( buying Americans products, making non-American products expensive by raising import taxes, not importing some foreign products etc... ) you are in fact close related to fascist or dictactural ideas.

···································································

他們沒有太多的選擇。這是一個或另一個。這是因為他們的政治制度是腐敗的。在歐洲，民主黨意味著被認為是左翼和中左翼政黨的政黨至少有20個不同的政黨，而共和黨代表的是右翼和中右翼政黨也有不同的政黨，但他們也被視為民主黨派。當一個以上的政黨由多數選舉產生時，當選政黨之間的聯盟就形成了，這意味著不同的政黨是未來四年的執政政府。事實上，這種制度比美國的制度要好得多因為如果美國人在兩個政黨之間有選擇的話，他們也會有這樣的問題：如果在這兩個政黨中有兩個小丑競選總統，那就是一個小丑還是另一個小丑！他們對民主意味著什么的觀念也被破壞了。民主來自希臘語“Demo cratia”一詞。更多

They have not really many choices. It's one or the other. This is because their political system is corrupted. In Europe Democrat means political parties who are considered as left wing and left middle wing parties ( there are at least 20 different parties for that ) and Republicans stand for right wing and right middle wing parties ( who has also different parties for that ) but they are also considered as democratic parties. When more than one parties are elected by majority coalitions between the elected parties are formed ( meaning that different parties are the ruling government for the next four years ). This system is as a matter of fact much better than the American system. Because if Americans have choices between two parties they will also have the problem that if for those two parties two clowns are running for president, it's one clown or another clown! They notion about what democracy means is also corrupted. Democracy comes from the greek word " Demo-cratia " ... more

···································································

有可能存在一個理性的共和黨人，但你永遠看不到他的臉，也聽不到他的名字。你只會在前十名中得到匿名評論。共和黨人會對任何膽敢表現出這種“溫和”的“異教徒”發火，把他們撕成碎片。所謂的負責任和個人責任的政黨知道，這永遠是奧巴馬的錯。哦，等等，他不準備連任。所以現在的政黨路線是“這是邪惡的左翼媒體的錯。”

It's possible that there IS such a thing as a rational republican, but you'll never see his/her face, or hear his/her name. You'll only get anonymous comments in top ten lists. Republicans will turn on any such "infidel" who dares show such "moderation", and tear them to pieces. The so-called party of Accountability and Personal Responsibility KNOWS that it's always Obama's fault. Oh wait he's not up for re-election. So now the party-line is "It's the evil left-wing media's fault."

···································································

投共和黨票的人通常會有愚蠢的論點，認為民主黨人只是為了幫助那些顛簸的人和非工人。他們真的認為，如果你是一個平均工資的工人，你投共和黨票后會成為超級富豪嗎？不幫助窮人不會讓你變得更富有，只會增加犯罪率和你的安全，然后他們就可以用這些錢來支付一個“警察國家”。愚蠢的美國人！

People who are voting for republicans have usually the stupid arguments that democrats are only there to help the bumps and the non-workers. Do they really think if you're a worker with a average salary that you will be superrich after voting for republicans? Not helping poor people will not make you richer, it will just rise the crime rate and therefor your security. Then they can use the money for paying a " policestate ". Stupid Americans!

···································································

雖然我不是共和黨人，但我明白并非所有人都是1%的人。人們投票給他們認為對他們最有利的人。例如，康德莉扎·賴斯早在她變得富有之前就是共和黨人。為什么？因為每當她父親去登記選民證的時候，民主黨人都拒絕了他，因為他是黑人。他去了那個允許他投票的政黨

Although I'm not a republican, I understand that not all people who are are necessarily the one percent. People vote on the person they feel will benefit them the most. For an example, Condeleeza Rice was a republican long before she became wealthy. Why? Because whenever her father went to register for a voters card democrats turned him down because he was black. He went to then party who would allow him to vote.

···································································

好吧，首先你批評我們選舉奧巴馬，一個非常自由的總統，現在你指責我們選舉共和黨？你要我們做什么，不要選任何人！但我可以同意共和黨人可能非常糟糕，我是一個支持選擇、反對槍支、自由民主黨的人，所以這份名單中的大部分都與我的信仰非常一致

Ok, first you critique us on electing Obama, a very liberal president and now you blame us for electing REPUBLICANS? What do you want us to do, not elect anyone! But I can agree that republicans can be very bad. I am a pro-choice, anti-gun, liberal democrat and so most of this list is very in tune with my beliefs