宿命悖論(Predestination Paradox)——歐美十大哲學與科幻悖論

宿命悖論(Predestination Paradox)——歐美十大哲學與科幻悖論在《歐美十大哲學與科幻悖論》中排名第5名。我們精選了部分網友觀點： ...

宿命悖論歐美十大哲學與科幻悖論在歐美十大哲學與科幻悖論中排名第5名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

讓我們用一個故事來理解這一點。1850年，鮑勃的馬被什么東西嚇壞了，差點把鮑勃帶到懸崖上，要不是有個陌生人攔住了那匹馬。這個奇怪的人后來因為豎立了一尊他的雕像而獲得了榮譽。兩百年后，鮑勃回到了過去，去看風景，看到有人的馬要翻越懸崖，他急忙去救了他的命。這個故事摘自維基百科的一篇文章，那么鮑勃是怎么救自己的？如果你說他未來的自我拯救了他，那么未來的自我是如何活了那么長時間來拯救自己的呢？但是再一次可以說，未來的自我是如何在這么長的時間里拯救自己的呢！-基特雷特蘇努

Lets take a story to understand this.In 1850, Bob's horse was spooked by something, and almost took Bob over a cliff, had it not been for a strange man stopping the horse. This strange man was later honored by having a statue of him erected. Two hundred years later, Bob goes back in time to sight-see, and sees someone's horse about to go over a cliff. He rushes to his aid and saves his life. (this story is taken from a wikipedia article)So how was Bob able to save himself? If you say that his future self saved him, then how did the FUTURE SELF survive for that long to save himself. But then again it can be said that the FUTURE SELF'S Future Future self saved him. Then how did THIS FUTURE FUTURE self survive that long to save himself! - Kiteretsunu

···································································

這讓我想起了引導系統-CityGuru

This reminds me of the bootstrap - CityGuru

···································································

在bootstrap中，一個對象或一條信息從未來發送到過去，從而形成一系列事件。在宿命論中，過去的行為受到未來的影響，但沒有一條信息或對象被發送到那里來創建事件鏈

In bootstrap, an object or piece of information is sent from the future to past creating a chain of events. In predestination, the actions of past are influenced by future but no piece of information or object is sent there to create chain of events. - Kiteretsunu