夢境論證(Dream Argument)——歐美十大哲學與科幻悖論

夢境論證(Dream Argument)——歐美十大哲學與科幻悖論在《歐美十大哲學與科幻悖論》中排名第6名。我們精選了部分網友觀點： ...

夢境論證歐美十大哲學與科幻悖論在歐美十大哲學與科幻悖論中排名第6名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

有一個故事可以完全解釋這個悖論。這是摘自維基百科的“莊子夢見自己是一只蝴蝶”的一天晚上，莊子369因為夢見自己是一只無憂無慮的蝴蝶，快樂地飛翔。醒來后，他想知道自己是不是剛夢見自己是蝴蝶的莊子，或者是一只剛剛開始做夢的蝴蝶，他就是莊子，這是他所說的“偉大夢想”的隱喻

One story will explain this paradox completely. This is taken from wikipedia."Zhuangzi dreamed he was a butterfly"One night, Zhuangzi (369 because) dreamed that he was a carefree butterfly, flying happily. After he woke up, he wondered how he could determine whether he was Zhuangzi who had just finished dreaming he was a butterfly, or a butterfly who had just started dreaming he was Zhuangzi. This was a metaphor for what he referred to as a "great dream": - Kiteretsunu

···································································

那到底是什么樣的夢？-吉克羅本

What kind of a dream is that anyway? - gemcloben

···································································

好吧，“下面的訪客”被刪除了。訪問者只是簡單地指出，這又一次不是一個悖論，而是一個難題，問一個簡單的三個字的問題浪費了大量的字眼。首先，這不是一個論點，而是一個問題。第二：不是所有的哲學論證都是“這樣”的。光是這句話，你就會看起來愚蠢的業余

Well, the "visitor below " was DELETED.The visitor simply pointed out that this, once again, was not a paradox, but a conundrum, and that it wasted a lot of words to ask a simple, three-word question.First off, it's not an ARGUMENT, but a QUESTION.Second: NOT "all arguments" in philosophy are "like this."That statement alone makes you look foolishly amateurish.

···································································

這個夢有什么這么難理解的？你從沒聽說過第三方觀點嗎？除了你之外，還有誰同意現實？另外，科學可以測量夢波的頻率，三角波和θ波的活動等等

What so difficult to understand about this dream? Have you never heard about third party perspectives? Others than you who agrees about reality? Plus, Science can measure dreamwaves ( the frequency of the delta and theta wave activity ) and so on...

···································································

對我下面的客人，你到底在說什么？你怎么回事啊？如果你不知道的話，哲學中所有的爭論都是這樣的，哲學作為一門學科是這樣的

To the visitor below me, what the hell are you talking about? What's your problem? If you didn't know, all the arguments in philosophy are like this. Philosophy as a subject is like this.