·······································································
·······································································
···································································
設立死刑,不管是注射死刑還是電椅,都要花錢。只要讓罪犯死在監獄里,就可以省下這筆錢。通過判處更多的罪犯死刑而不假釋終身監禁,我們可以節省近數十億美元,用于投資于冷案等
Setting up the execution, whether it be lethal injection or electric chair, costs money. Money which could be saved just by leaving convicts to die in prison. By sentencing more convicts to life without parole over the death penalty, we would save near billions that can be used to invest in cold cases, among other things. - Archived
···································································
然而,在無期徒刑中,監獄將不得不花很多錢為囚犯購買衣服、食物、水、終身安全和其他終生服務
However in a life sentence, the prison will have to spend much money on clothing, food, water, lifetime security, and other services for the prisoner for the entire lifetime of the prisoner. - Not_A_Weeaboo
···································································
不管怎樣,監獄已經在支付這筆錢了。正如我所說,用于處決的錢可能會超過政府的資金,節省近數十億美元。——存檔
The prison is already covering that regardless. As I said, the money spent on executions could go to over government fundings and save near billions. - Archived
···································································
是的,但是如果他們要照顧的犯人少一些,而且肯定有成本效益高的殺死重罪犯的方法,那么用于死刑的錢就會少很多,死刑的成本是為了讓平民安心,因為犯人的死亡是無痛的和人道的——細菌24
Yes, but it would be much less money going to it if there was less prisoners they had to take care of and there are definitely ways of killing a felon that would be cost effective, the cost of the death penalty is for the peace of mind of the civilians that the prisoners death was painless and humane - germshep24
···································································
如果是監獄還是政府的賺錢機器又有什么區別呢
What difference does it make if it's the prison or the government's money - DenyYourMaker
···································································
哇,說得對-你的制造者
Wow a good point - DenyYourMaker
0 篇文章
如果覺得我的文章對您有用,請隨意打賞。你的支持將鼓勵我繼續創作!