發散型-維羅妮卡·羅斯(Divergent - Veronica Roth)——歐美最高估的書

發散型-維羅妮卡羅斯(Divergent - Veronica Roth)——歐美最高估的書在《歐美最高估的書》中排名第6名。我們精選了部分網友觀點： ...

發散型維羅妮卡羅斯歐美最高估的書在歐美最高估的書中排名第6名。

·······································································

我們精選了部分網友觀點：

···································································

我投了贊成票，因為這只是一本書，就像其他所有正在炒作的書一樣，像饑餓游戲和選擇三部曲。它們都有一個假小子女孩作為主角，生活在未來，并將民間分成了明確的群體。在這三本書中，還有一場推翻政府的斗爭。所以我你可以繼續說下去，但這只是為了證明這一點。你可以說你想說什么關于伊莎貝拉·斯旺，但至少她有一個不同于卡特尼斯、美國和比阿特麗斯的個性

I voted for this, because it's just a book like all the other books that are in hype right now, like the hunger games and the selection trilogy. They all have a tomboy girl as protagonist and live in the future, and have the folk divided into definitive groups. There is also in all three book series a fight to overthrow the government. So I can go on for way more, but it's just to prove the point. You can say what you want about Isabella Swan, but at least she has a different personality from Katniss, America and Beatrice.

···································································

這是一本可怕的，被高估了的書，應該排在《暮光之城》和《50個陰影》之后的第三位，它顯示了瘋狂的數量的dei ex machina和比喻的使用。這是一個饑餓游戲撕毀，甚至不是主要的問題。沒有一個字符實際上有任何個性，除了漫畫。崔絲是一個不討人喜歡的，我不明白為什么有人關心她死了。四個未能達到他身邊的一個目的，如令人信服的愛情興趣

This is a horrible, overrated book that should be ranked third behind Twilight and 50 shades. Author Veronica Roth wrote it when she was in college, and it shows in the insane amount of dei ex machina and tropes used. That it is a Hunger Games rip-off isn't even the main problem. None of the characters actually have any personality besides caricatures. Tris is anything but likeable, and I can't see why anyone cares that she died. Four fails to serve the one purpose he's around for, as a compelling love interest.

···································································

老實說，我看完電影就看了這本書，這部電影真的很棒。這本書？不算太多。它是如此的哀傷。人物們是如此的哀傷。人們一直在談論這本書是多么的令人驚奇，它是如何比饑餓游戲不真實的好得多，多么完美等等。不！不！崔斯是個弱者，四個是無聊的-發散絕對被高估了

I had to be honest, I read this book after watching the movie, and the movie was actually great. The book? Not so much. It's so bleh. The characters are so bleh. People kept on talking about how amazing this book is, how it's so much better than The Hunger Games ( NOT TRUE ), how Fourtris is so perfect and so on. No! No! Tris is a weakling, Four is boring - Divergent is most definitely overrated.

···································································

我沒有發現崔絲是一個真正的角色。她對我來說是不可接受的，因為她的主要動機是沖動的，沒有深刻的邏輯性。上一本書中的決斗視角是駭人聽聞的，因為兩個角色都寫得一樣，無法區分。但你知道為什么分歧被夸大了，這是因為西奧·詹姆斯+好萊塢+“反烏托邦亞小說”

I didn't find Tris to be a real character. She was unrelatable to me as her main motive was impulsive and showed no deep logic. The duel perspective in the last book was appaling in the way that both characters were written the same and were indistiguishable.But you what to know why Divergent is overhyped, and that's because of Theo James + Hollywood + 'Dystopian YA Fiction"

···································································

好吧，所以我被告知要讀這本書，它真的很無聊。在我讀它之前，我以為它是一個大師級的作品，每個人都在談論它。人物都很無聊，并不是真的堅持我，人們之所以讀這本書的唯一原因是因為它有著火熱而神秘的四個

Ok, so I was told to read the book and it was really boring. Before I read it, I expected it to be a master piece the way every one is talking about it. The characters are boring and don't really stick to me and the only reason why people read this is because of the hot and mysterious four.

···································································

令人難以置信的衍生。我總是覺得諷刺的是，這部電影的銷售線是“分化的”，因為它并沒有偏離任何東西，基本上只是復制已經衍生的“饑餓游戲”系列

Incredibly derivative. I always found it ironic that the movie's selling line was "Diverge," since it doesn't diverge from anything and is basically just copying the already derivative "Hunger Games" series.

···································································

當然，它被高估了。但就你的恐怖小說類型而言，這本書并沒有那么糟糕，盡管和你的成人小說相比，它很痛苦。如果說有什么被過分高估的話，那就是饑餓游戲

Sure, it's overrated. But as far as the horrid genre of YA fiction goes, this one's not THAT bad (although compare to your average adult fic, and it's painful). If there's anything that's horribly overrated, it's the Hunger Games.

···································································

我記得我試著讀過這本書，只是不明白為什么它受到那么多人的喜愛，為什么它寫得那么平淡？在我看來，寫作單調是這里的大問題

I remember I tried reading this book and I just don't understand why it's loved by so many people. Why is it so blandly written? the writing being monotone is, in my opinion, the big problem here.

···································································

這本書是對饑餓游戲和矩陣的剽竊，非常無聊

This book is a rip-off of The Hunger games and Matrix, and was extremely boring.

···································································

高估，無聊，就像其他很多書一樣

Overrated, boring and just like a lot of other books that came out earlier